Tuesday, August 20, 2024

To: School  Construction Managers.

Topic:  Grotesque Overpayment of  Roofing, and Roofing Services, through a Purchasing Cooperative, or directly, from Tremco, or Garland.





My previous post is chock full of cases, and tons of public record describing MANY INSTANCES where this has happened, or is happening.:

Publicly Funded Roofs - "Exclusion" of competition to SCAM taxpayers. Who does it, and how.


Roofing is the costliest item of any school maintenance budget, which are being decimated by this "Exclusionary" tactic.   The claims about being "Competitive4" are lies, and I can prove it.  I do not traffic in "Opinion", but "Public Record".

Consequences for the Purchaser can be substantial.  Here I am with the Oklahoma State Auditor, where 13 school districts were issued full audits by the Oklahoma Attorney General.  Imagine that for a moment.

https://www.news9.com/story/5e35afab83eff40362bec06e/oklahoma-school-districts-accused-of-wasting-tax-dollars

That's me in the yellow blsazer, just beneath the large photo.

Okay, that's enough backstory for now, but I could go on all day about these "License to Steal" scenarios.  NEVER  buy a roof through a Purchasing Cooperative, or you may find yourself in the paper.  People will find out you're paying approximately 50% MORE, without additional benefit.

NOTE:  Tremco was fined $61,000,000.00 by the DOJ for abusing GSA contracts.

RPM International Inc. and Tremco Inc. Pay Nearly $61 Million for Failing to Provide Government Discounts Provided to Others


https://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/rpm-international-inc-and-tremco-inc-pay-nearly-61-million-failing-provide-government

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

A typical example being levied against Tremco::

https://www.ibj.com/articles/12808-former-sales-rep-alleges-ohio-roofing-firm-overcharged-tremco-denies-civil-charges-of-unfair-business-practices-in-its-work-for-indiana-school-corporations

Former sales rep alleges Ohio roofing firm overcharged: Tremco denies civil charges of unfair business practices in its work for Indiana school corporations.






A longtime sales representative for one of the roofing industry’s largest manufacturers alleges his former employer defrauded Indiana public schools out of more than $1.5 million.

Brennen Baker charges that the company, Beachwood, Ohio-based Tremco Inc., circumvented Indiana’s public bidding laws for school projects; overcharged for its services; and billed for materials, services and equipment it never delivered.

Baker was a Tremco sales rep for southwest and central Indiana from 1991 until January 2004. Baker, who later founded the Fishers-based roofing construction consultancy Moisture Management LLC, has been battling Tremco in court for more than two years, initially over whether his involvement with Moisture Management violated a noncompete agreement.

Baker, who filed the suit, said he hadn’t committed a violation, since Moisture Management sells consulting services, not roofing materials. He also pursued damages for what he called defamatory and libelous comments made by his former managers.

Tremco countersued, claiming Baker, who’d been doing business outside of his old sales territory, simply wanted to back into it.

Things got uglier after that.

In legal filings by his attorneys at locally based Hoover Hull LLP, Baker argued that he should be freed from competition restrictions because he alleges Tremco has “unclean hands” due to its business practices.

He claims that because Tremco sold its goods and services to schools through an education purchasing co-op, it dodged public bidding requirements for school projects. He says the lack of oversight allowed Baker to grossly overcharge for roofing materials and services by using bait-and-switch tactics or charging for products that weren’t used.

Baker claims he approached his Tremco supervisor with concerns about these issues, but was told “not to concern himself” and that he would be replaced if he refused to continue using the company’s sales techniques.

Tremco denies the allegations.

“Mr. Baker’s lawsuit, we believe firmly, is without basis,” said Tremco spokesman Carl Zeitz. “We will refute that in court if need be. We’ll demonstrate from the facts that his allegations are without merit, and that in fact Tremco … is an outstanding American manufacturing corporation.”

Tremco-owned by Medina, Ohiobased RPM International Inc.-has 1,900 employees and makes a variety of roofing materials and waterproofing sealants.

Baker’s suit specifically cites as victims five Indiana school districts-including Westfield-Washington School Corp. in Hamilton County and Center Grove School Corp. in Johnson County. The others named are Rossville Consolidated School Corp. and Western School Corp. in north-central Indiana Howard County and Spencer-Owen Community Schools in southern Indiana.

“Baker uncovered an alarming scheme whereby Tremco and [its general contracting subsidiary Weatherproofing Technologies Inc.] would use the … line item contract to charge Indiana public schools for roofing materials, services and equipment never supplied and to charge these schools grossly excessive amounts for what was actually provided,” Baker’s brief reads.

Not so, counters Tremco’s local attorney, Krieg DeVault LLP partner Mark Merkle.

He noted that Tremco had gone through a competitive bidding process to become the co-op’s supplier. That process, he said, ensures school districts get a good deal without having to bid out their contract.

“Anybody purchasing through [the coop] has a minimum 13-percent discount on Tremco materials, which is the best rate available, including the government rate. It can’t get better than that,” Merkle said.

He said Baker honored his employment agreement for about six months after his resignation, then began soliciting busi- ness in his former Tremco territory.

He said Baker and his attorneys cherrypicked evidence they believe bolsters their claims of overcharges to schools, ignoring instances where Tremco underestimated the amount of roofing materials, or the number of man hours, needed to complete a school roof job. In cases when its costs run higher than estimates, Tremco must swallow the loss.

“The sole intent and purpose of his lawsuit, in our minds, was to avoid a validly written restriction on competition,” Merkle said. “When you get to the heart of the matter and cut to the chase, we believe the court will find that was the purpose.”

He pointed out that the Indiana Attorney General’s Office in 2005 decided against pursuing an investigation of Tremco after it received similar allegations from a Lafayette-based group called Taxpayers United for Fairness. The group had asked for a meeting to discuss its accusation of statewide school construction fraud.

One of the group’s concerns was the same Rossville school project-the renovation of the high school and elementary school roofs-in which Baker now alleges fraud.

In a letter to Taxpayers United in late 2005, an official in the Attorney General’s Office noted that a State Board of Accounts audit had raised concern about the bidding procedures used for the project. But the office opted not to investigate because the audit had not found “malfeasance, misfeasance or nonfeasance against school corporation officials.”

Taxpayers United for Fairness is now defunct, Merkle said, and Tremco is pursuing a slander case against its individual members.

It will be up to Hamilton Circuit Court to decide the merits of Baker’s and Tremco’s claims against each other. Both sides are asking the court to rule in their favor without a trial. If those motions are denied, the matter will go to trial June 11.

In the meantime, two school corporations named in Baker’s suit have stopped doing business with Tremco.

Spencer-Owen Superintendent Marsha Turner-Shear said that when her district renovated its high school last year, Tremco was the subcontractor that replaced the roof.

School officials were upset when they received the roof bill because it was twice what the general contractor had quoted, Turner-Shear said. After discussions, Tremco cut its bill in half, she said, but the experience left a bad taste.

“After that, we severed business ties immediately with Tremco,” she said.

School districts depend on the honesty of their contractors, said Taffy Cooke, director of operations for Western School Corp.

She said the district worked with Tremco when Baker was with the firm. But when he left, Western broke ties and tried another roofing company.

“They were very upset we had switched to a different vendor,” she said. “That would be an understatement.”

Eventually, the district switched again, this time to Baker’s Moisture Management.

Vendor relationships are key, she said, because on projects like roof replacements it’s difficult for a district to assess whether it is getting what it paid for. She noted that replacing a school roof can cost several hundred thousand dollars.

“If we were overcharged, you’re kind of at the mercy of trusting the person you’re dealing with,” she said. “It would be like you going to the dentist, and maybe they used a material that was substandard for your filling. You’d need another dentist to tell you.”


------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

NOTE:  Retired 2003, I do not solicit nor accept compensation or public advancement of any kind.

I am happy to help anyone who needs help.

Reject negativity in all forms, and always remember to "Keep Looking Up".

Robert R. Solomon
RobertRSolomon@aol.com
State Certified CCC 1325620
Tampa, Florida

Saturday, March 23, 2024

Publicly Funded Roofs - "Exclusion" of competition to SCAM taxpayers. Who does it, and how.

 Welcome Good People:

EVERYTHING you could possibly want to know about "Preferred Vendors", "Sole Source", "Proprietary Specifications", and other  methods of excluding competition to guarantee predetermined outcomes.  In other words : "BID RIGGING".  Who does it, and how.

Publicly Funded Projects are spending money earned by OTHERS, and subject to independent third party oversight.  





Roofing and roofing services are the most expensive items of any school maintenance budget, and why "Predatory Sales Models" attack the soft underbelly of government administrators who in reality, have no power


I provide this data to protect taxpayers from KNOWN, ORGANIZED, and PUBLICLY DOCUMENTED Scams perpetrated upon schools across all of North America..

I am not affiliated with any Manufacturer, Distributor, Consultant, or Contractor, and am wholly responsible for content.  If you feel I've made a factual, documented error, you will send the concern to me.  I'll review, and make a correction if necessasry.

RobertRSolomon@aol.com



Competitive Public Bidding:

 

“Publicly Funded Roofing and Roofing Services"


By: Robert R. Solomon

 

NOTE:  Retired 2003, do not solicit, nor accept, compensation, or personal

advancement of any kind.


 Onward:

 The roofing discipline has a steadfast position against "Exclusion" of fair competition in publicly funded projects.  See support documents.      

We do not seek, nor support, "Exclusion" often found in purchasing cooperatives through "Line Item", "Sole Source", “JOC”, "Proprietary Specifications" (unnecessarily restrictive), and "Preferred Vendors".  

The discipline believes we should have an opportunity to bid on public projects funded by our own tax dollars.

"Fair Competition" is circumvented by purchasing cooperatives, and their operatives.  They are not competitive in the private market, and therefore not competitive in the public market.  

We abhor the "Predatory Sales Models" that advertise "We handle it all", or "Partnering" with government agencies.  The outcomes are predetermined by naming only ONE manufacturer.

 No government agency may give even the slightest hint of favoritism, and it exposes our schools to unnecessary suit.   

Many examples of this exist, and all one has to do is type "School Roofing Scam" into your browser, and the same on YouTube.  You will find no shortage of investigative reports there.

 Please notice the reports feature two manufacturers: Tremco (aka WTI), and Garland.  It is not our desire to "Exclude" these manufacturers, but ADD fair competition, in the form of major, financially sound, competitive, material manufacturers.

 Firestone, GAF, Johns Manville and Carlisle Syntec, Sika Sarnafil are a few, but we have many fine examples of "Honorable" manufacturers.  All backed by billions of dollars in assets, and strong underwriting capability.

 It is the taxpayer, our schools, and our children, we fight for.  In the absence of fair competition, schools are paying a "Premium", upwards of 50% (or more), and receiving no additional benefit.  School maintenance budgets are being decimated by this organized exclusion policy.

The bulk of that money (25%) goes straight into a "Salesman's" pocket, and then an average of 2% to the purchasing cooperative.  By this arrangement, the taxpayer dollar is immediately reduced to 73 cents, and nothing to show for it.  

Frankly, even if removing, or adjusting, the sales "Commissions", you would still overpay by a large sum.

We do not wish to disrupt commerce, but to make sure the money reaches its intended purpose.  Please note that when I refer to "Bidders", I mean "Responsible Bidders" who meet a STANDARD of criteria:

 This would include financial requirements, and in most cases, protecting the taxpayers with a "Performance and Payment Bond" above projects with a minimum of $25,000.00 - $50,000.00.

 Protecting the taxpayer from default, or expenditure of additional monies.

 We know that all projects must provide "Serviceability", and "Value".  "Cheap" does not equal "Value" by the way.  This may be remedied through independent, third party oversight, and specifications that are "Inclusive".   We bid to a "Standard", NOT to a Manufacturer.

The following data has taken years to compile, but knowing I've helped someone in a bind, makes it worthwhile.

Take a moment to throw a glass of ice water in your face and wake up.

All Set? Here is the Public Record

The DOJ fined Tremco (RPM) $61,000,000.00 for the abuse of GSA contracts:

 https://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/rpm-international-inc-and-tremco-inc-pay-nearly-61-million-failing-provide-government

 ---------------------------------

 Another example, eloquently described by the State of New Jersey, here:

http://www.state.nj.us/sci/pdf/Roofing_Report.pdf

 ------------------------

 

ROOFING SCAM - OHIO.wmv

 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nGPNJxK1ZRQ


-----------------------------


News 2 I-Team:  Garland

ROOFING SCAM - NEW JERSEY.wmv

 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tWwb3UNn0V0

 

-------------------------------------


Roofing Scam – New Mexico

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gEKVSrPui08

 

------------------------------------

California Roofing Scam

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2SPGTLMKT60

 

----------------------------------



ROOFING SCAM - NEW JERSEY:

 

http://www.nysun.com/national/legislators-mayors-arrested-in-new-jersey-bribery/62077/

--------------------------


Ron Solomon ON Oklahoma News 9

“Oklahoma Schools Accused of Wasting Taxpayer Dollars”:

https://www.news9.com/story/5e35afab83eff40362bec06e/oklahoma-school-districts-accused-of-wasting-tax-dollars

------------------------

“DOJ Fines Tremco $61,000,000.00”

https://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/rpm-international-inc-and-tremco-inc-pay-nearly-61-million-failing-provide-government

 ----------------------

From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Sec. & Exch. Comm'n v. RPM Int'l, Inc.

https://casetext.com/case/sec-exch-commn-v-rpm-intl-inc-2

 -----------------------------------------

 SEC Fraud Case Singled Out Global Company's Chief Lawyer, Compliance Officer

The Securities and Exchange Commission alleged that the GC failed to disclose key facts about a Justice Department probe of RPM international Inc., a $5.5 billion global coatings, sealants and buildings materials company.

By Phillip Bantz | December 29, 2020 at 02:11 PM

https://www.law.com/corpcounsel/2020/12/29/sec-fraud-case-singled-out-global-companys-chief-lawyer-compliance-officer/?slreturn=20210308205304

 

Shut Out: New Jersey Strikes Down Suspicious Bidding.

 
http://www.roofingcontractor.com/articles/shut-out-new-jersey-strikes-down-suspicious-bidding

---------------------------------------

 An architect, manufacturer and roofing contractors discuss proprietary specifications:

https://www.professionalroofing.net/Articles/In-their-opinions--10-02-2002/147


---------------------------------------

NK school board approves Vinland roof replacement


https://www.kitsapdailynews.com/news/nk-school-board-approves-vinland-roof-replacement/

 

------------------------------------

 Garland Consent Decree in Bid Rigging Case:

https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjVmmGoJ_czAvpalwqeGNLVlFm1N8Ly-_7f0v9pKKeheIFMQ-hIY1dOk8_lZSKcEre1InJrAL9XmInVC3ffs-s4AhAZBqe1BZ4URCkNQJ7hsS7J_bWeSOHW3daECHUMPPb_QbH5viTiOr4/s1600-h/Garland+Consent+Order+page+1+001

------------------------------

 “State Could Punish School District:”

https://www.dailyitem.com/news/state-could-punish-district/article_bcbb1c19-a4e5-5707-8ab8-97d647a0e690.html

-------------------------------

 CV school district settles lawsuit with Carlisle SynTec Systems employees:

https://wikiroof.blogspot.com/search/label/Carlisle%20breaks%20up%20Co-Op%20scam

------------------------

Garland's lobbyist, promoting the school roofing scam.

 

https://wikiroof.blogspot.com/2018/07/garlands-lo


--------------------------------------------------

Schools paying millions too much for new roofs

CONSTRUCTION Noncompetitive process raises price of school roofs


http://www.sfgate.com/news/article/Schools-paying-millions-too-much-for-new-roofs-3258031.php

---------------------------------------------

"VA Official admits to 64 Counts of Construction Bribery"

 

https://wikiroof.blogspot.com/2014/05/va-official-admits-to-64-counts-of.html

 

-------------------------------------------

"TCPN, Tremco, and Taxpayers"

 

https://wikiroof.blogspot.com/2013/11/tcpn-tremco-and-taxpayers.html

 

APS Changing Roofing Specs; Officials Hope To Save District Money


By Russell Contreras
Journal Staff Writer
    Albuquerque

 

https://www.abqjournal.com/news/metro/288320metro01-14-05.htm

 -----------------------------------------

 

 Eloquently described by the State of New Jersey, here:

http://www.state.nj.us/sci/pdf/Roofing_Report.pdf

 ------------------------

Critics Say APS Roofing Costs Sky-High

http://www.stopthewarmachine.org/events/jan18pdf.pdf

 -------------------

“The Fix Is In” 

At least that's what Janet Campbell claimed about construction bids at UCSF, where she soon found herself out of a job

By Peter ByrneWednesday, Feb 26 2003

http://www.sfweekly.com/2003-02-26/news/the-fix-is-in/


-------------------------------------------

 

Public School Roofing Projects
1999

A statewide investigation of public school roof construction projects revealed widespread waste and abuse, including conflicts of interest, subversion of public contracting, improper labor practices and inadequate oversight that place the safety of school children in jeopardy and cost New Jersey taxpayers millions of dollars each year. 

The Commission aired the preliminary findings of its investigation during a two-day public hearing in December.


http://www.state.nj.us/sci/school.shtm

-----------------------

Investigations of Improper Activities by State Employees: February 2007 Through June 2007 September 2007 Report I2007-2

https://www.bsa.ca.gov/pdfs/reports/I2007-2.pdf

And:


http://www.bsa.ca.gov/pdfs/reports/I2003-2.pdf

----------------------

California State Assembly

Committee on Accountability and Administrative Review

 


http://aaar.assembly.ca.gov/20102011hearings

June 30, 2010

Protecting Taxpayers Dollars through Public Bidding:


 9:00 a.m. - State Capitol, Room 437

·         06/30/10 - Agenda [pdf]

·         06/30/10 - Background [pdf]

·         Recommendations [pdf]

·         Exhibits A-F [pdf]


Major position papers:



IIBEC Position Statement on Procurement – Support Document.

https://iibec.org/advocacy/policy-and-position-statements/

 

Procurement – June 21, 2012

IIBEC supports public policies, requirements, and administrative procedures in public procurement processes that mandate the open selection of goods, services, and construction contracts on the basis of qualifications; and it opposes such procurement on the sole basis of fees, costs, and/or proprietary specifications.

 

IIBEC Position Statement on Procurement – Support Document

National Roofing Contractors Association

https://nrca.net/RoofingNews/nrca-issues-action-alert-regarding-reverse-auction-legislation.3-4-2020.8401/Details/Story

 

NRCA issues Action Alert regarding reverse auction legislation

 

“There is broad consensus the use of reverse auctions for federal construction procurement is detrimental to the roofing industry. Allowing reverse auctions in construction and design procurement is ineffective because they fail to properly allocate risk; make it more difficult for small and disadvantaged businesses to be awarded a bid; and inhibit the competitive bidding process.

The Construction Consensus Procurement Improvement Act of 2019 (S. 1434 / H.R. 5644) is legislation to prohibit the use of reverse auctions in federal construction procurement.

NRCA is encouraging its members to urge their legislators to support the legislation, which will benefit roofing companies, ensure the quality of procurements for federal construction projects and protect taxpayers.

For more information or to take action and email your legislators, visit the NRCA Grassroots Advocacy Network at:”  roofingadvocacy.nrca.net.

 -----------------------------------------------------

City of Long Beach

Re: JOC – Gordian Group

 

https://buildinginformationmanagement.files.wordpress.com/2016/06/long-beach-job-order-contract-audit.pdf

 ---------------------------------

 

Pennsylvania Low slope Roofing assessment August 17, 2010



Carlisle Construction Materials Pennsylvania Roofing Study AEPA Purchasing Cooperatives Analysis of Tremco Line Item Contracts 2005‐2010

https://responsibleprocurements.org/wp/wp-content/uploads/2015/11/Ducker-Carlisle-Reports-PA-vs-AEPA-Tremco-costs.pdf

 

Ducker-Carlisle Report

When taking the money away from an argument, all that's left is the truth.  That  remains at the forefront of my mind, do my very best to bring only documented TRUTH. Nothing else will do.

 

These Public Roofing Scams are decimating school maintenance budgets across North America.

My Brothers and Sisters of the roofing discipline have every right to compete for their own tax dollars, and not be shut out.

 

Oklahoma Representative Jason Murphey is a hero to the taxpayers.

http://www.hd31.org/blog.php?title=An-Example-of-Legalized-Corruption

We in construction trades do not want preferential treatment, but fair competition.

The only thing stopping it is "Purchasing Cooperatives", and administrators who are either uninformed, or corrupt.

MUCH RESPECT to Rep. Murphey for standing up for us, and taxpayers across this country.

http://www.hd31.org/blog.php?title=An-Example-of-Legalized-Corruption

 



An Example of Legalized Corruption



Jason Murphey's Blog.

POSTS FROM REPRESENTATIVE MURPHEY's BLOG

An Example of Legalized Corruption

By: Jason Murphey | Sunday, December 8th, 2013 05:10:04 PM |

Almost one year ago, Senator Clark Jolley asked me to assist him in bringing an end to what appeared to be a practice of legalized corruption. Having worked with Jolley on numerous modernization and efficiency measures, I have learned to pay close attention to his concerns. He frequently proposes cost saving and efficiency reforms, and his proposals are taken very seriously by the Legislature. Jolley had received reports from whistleblowers who exposed extremely disturbing abuses and he wanted to work on legislation to stop the practice.

Jolley's request started an intense one-year saga to remedy one of the worst abuses of the taxpayer dollar that I have seen. That saga continues to this day.

Let me tell you about this horrific abuse known as sole-source specing.

Voters within a school district or municipality approve a massive bond issue calling for the construction of new buildings without realizing they have just contributed to legalized corruption. Flush with cash, the benefiting governing board hires design professionals to specify which materials are to be used in the new project.

The designers present the governing board with grandiose plans that highlight the inclusion of expensive features. It's all too easy for gullible board members to approve these plans because they are after all spending other peoples' money. These designers then draw the specifications so tightly that only one supplier can provide the expensive features. In this way, competition is eliminated and the supplier can charge exponentially more than would otherwise be paid because the competitive bidding process has been eliminated. In some cases, the project designer may actually allow the sales engineer for a product manufacturer to write the specification so that only that one product qualifies.

Sole-source specing has long-term implications.

More:  http://www.hd31.org/blog.php?title=An-Example-of-Legalized-Corruption

 

Copyright © State Representative Jason Murphey, 2012
2300 N. Lincoln BLVD, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma 73105 - (405) 557-7350
Jason.Murphey@okhouse.gov - @JWMurphey

-------------------------------

 Schools are paying around 40%-50% MORE through Purchasing Cooperatives (rotten to the core) using ONLY Garland, or Tremco, as they isolate, and exclude everyone else.  We are talking about competing for your own tax dollars, and livelihood.  


How'd that taste?




 

Price gouging on school projects must stop

 May 26, 2017

 

https://lancasteronline.com/opinion/columnists/price-gouging-on-school-projects-must-stop/article_45cc362e-4178-11e7-aba9-930567d283b9.html

 



The most Honorable and achieved person in all of roofing is, in my experience: Ms. Helene Hardy Pierce of GAF.  She is a big part of why GAF is an “Honorable Firm”, and trusted by every contractor in this country.  I cannot overemphasize her achievement, and importance.

 

Excerpt:

“School districts in Pennsylvania have been victims of a very expensive waste of taxpayer money for the past decade or more.

Certainly they can save money when they use cooperative purchasing for items like pencils and computers. But since at least 2005, our schools have lost millions of dollars when they purchased roofing through this kind of system.

Like their counterparts across the commonwealth, Lancaster-area school districts have overpaid for roofing projects. Fortunately, there is movement in Harrisburg to address this scandalous misuse of tax dollars.

This is a national problem, and it is very serious in Pennsylvania. Schools have been victimized by cooperative purchasing schemes that have cost taxpayers in excess of $100 million.

How is it that school districts have been paying twice as much they should for roofing projects?

A survey by Ducker Worldwide found that Pennsylvania schools that purchased roofs through the Association of Educational Purchasing Agencies drastically overpaid for roofing projects. According to the Ducker study, from 2005 to 2010, schools spent $100 million more than they would have spent through public competitive bidding. You can find the survey, as well as studies in other states, at bit.ly/ProcurementSurvey.

This wasted money could have purchased 33 million school lunches for low-income students, or 100,000 school computers.”

Continued….

------------------------------


If anyone ever has an issue (factually) with anything here, please be kind enough to bring it to my attention.  I will retract, or modify the statement.  Please understand that here, I do not offer 'Opinion".  I will respectfully request you furnish public record to support any discord.

My Friends across the globe, I am so thankful, and appreciative, for your valuable time spent with me here. To date, almost 400,000 visitors, and am humbled that anyone cares one bit about what I have to say.

I pray that you reject negativity in all forms, and always remember to keep looking "UP".


It's much deeper than all this, but you'll be well served to stay away from Tremco, Garland, and all Purchasing Cooperatives.

Administrator "Ease" , and "We handle it all", is a combination for grotesque overspending.  If you want to take a chance, prepare yourself for the State Auditor's inquiry.

Use the search box and insert  words like: purchasing cooperative, fair competition, Tremco, Garland. and most of all "Predatory Sales Models".

NOTE:  Retired 2003, do not solicit, nor accept, compensation, or personal advancement of any kind.  Siimply put:  I don't BUY, nor SELL things.


I'm the only one who has absolutely no reason to deceive you.  My job is to be honest, and earn your trust.  I will help anyone who asks for help.




Respect,

 

Robert R. "Ron" Solomon

RobertRSolomon@@aol.com

Public Roofing Oversight

Public Procurement Analyst

State Certified CCC 1325620

Licensed Roofing Consultant