Friday, April 19, 2013

"Roofing Contractor Profile - Access Roofing & Restoration, LLC"

As you know, I RARELY feature a product or service.

But I came across this down to earth (and truthful) description by the newest member of Roof Consultant's Alliance.  After reading the full website of 2,500 members, I felt this "REAL WORLD" description helpful to the layman, and advanced residential contractors.

"Access Roofing & Restoration, LLC"

1411 Linwood Blvd. in Oklahoma City.

www.accessroof.com 

405-537-6000

Ask for Mr. Jeff Breeding


I came across this application to "Roof Consultant's Alliance" that was more "informative" to an owner than just saying "we do it all", which is a cliche'.  NOBODY "Does It All", and if you think about it, how could they "Specialize" in ALL roofing subsets?

At any rate, I do not know anyone at Access Roofing & Restoration, and am just making an observation:

This presentation is very useful to you, the end user.

The Roofing Wall of Shame

The photos were taken in Oklahoma and Colorado in 2009 and 2010. This is the best way to illustrate the disparity between our organization and the 'competition'. While the photos seem rather extreme, the truth is that greed and ignorance in our industry make this type of 'Shame' commonplace.
 
This absolute abandonment of safety practices and manufacturer specifications is much more prevalent in Oklahoma and Texas than Colorado because roofing permits and contractor licensing are not required. The end result is roofs have NO manufacturer's warranty of any kind, are apt to leak or blow off with the next thunderstorm, and severely diminish the heating and cooling efficiency of the homes they are intended to protect.
 
The foremost reason for this problem is that consumers have been battered into accepting the idea that their roof is simply an inconvenient maintenance cost rather than a valuable aesthetic and structural feature of their home. Who can blame them? When a hailstorm hits, the typical homeowner may receive a hundred or more flyers on their doorstep and experience incessant telemarketing calls from 'contractors' wanting to make a quick buck on the roof & gutters.
 
The widespread notion that a roof is not worthy of conventional consideration (as a kitchen or bathroom would be) has been established by the idea that another hailstorm is just around the corner and the roof, as a commodity, is simply not worth the trouble. 'Roofing Contractors' milling about by the thousands trying to distinguish themselves by offering the 'cheapest fix' and 'best deal' drive this mentality home. The truth is, a relatively small percentage of property owners in storm-prone markets experience hail or wind damage that warrants a roof replacement more than once every 10 years. Many homeowners in Oklahoma City, for example, have a roof that is 15 years old or older. The pressure to 'save money' and get a 'great deal' has reached critical mass. It is raping home equity and property values from entire communities.
 
 


 
These roofers in Oklahoma City were moving at a frantic pace. Their rapid progress seemed to impress the neighbor across the street but a closer look at what they are doing in impressive in another way.
 
 
These landscapers/roofers are trying to earn a buck but clearly do not have any formal training in proper roofing techniques, do not understand building code and didn't bother to read the shingle wrapper to follow basic manufacturer specifications.
 
The rusted flashing are clearly going to be re-used. When the skylight leaks, the roofing materials around the skylight will need to be removed and the flashing replaced. The roofing shingles removed for the repair may need to be re-used after the repair because matching shingles may no longer be available on the market. The interior damages will generally NOT be covered by a workmanship warranty IF the company doing the work is even still in town to respond to the homeowner's call.
 
Also, these multiple layers of roofing felt have created a vapor barrier rather than a vapor retarder; compounding the problem of this structure lacking proper ventilation. The next roof replacement (if the old felt is actually removed) will reveal decking that is orange, swelled, and possibly rotted due to condensation buildup. At that time, the homeowner will most likely incur the cost of replacing bad decking out-of-pocket, simply because the 'roofers' were too lazy to remove the old felt.
 
Also notice that the old shingle nails have been pounded down rather than removed. This is bad because the nails will work themselves loose as they start to rust (from condensation) which will cut holes in the new felt and start wearing the shingles from the underside.
 
 
 
 
Which is old, which is new? The shingles that you see are new. At the hip, they are cut off and the wood decking is bare at the gap where the decking meets on the hip framing member. The roofers will be relying on new hip shingles 'caps' to keep the roof water-tight rather than properly wrapping the felt over the hip. There is a good chance that wind-driven rain will cause this roof to leak until the hip caps fully seal over the next few days, weeks, or months.
 
That moisture will evaporate from the attic or become a petri dish for mold and mildew. Also notice that the new felt is installed diagonally over the old because it seemed convenient for the roofers. By the time the homeowner returns from work, new shingles will be installed and the shortcut will be a secret. However, if roofing materials are not installed according to the manufacturer's specifications, there is no warranty.
 
Unfortunately, if this batch of shingles happens to be a defective one, the manufacturer will decline to act because the warranty was voided by this improper felt installation among other things.
 
 
 

This is exactly what you want to avoid. The installer did not wrap the hip with felt means that the hip cap shingle is the only thing between your home and a leak. Notice that on the lower cap, the nails are high so that the sealant from the cap above never made proper contact. It was probably a matter of days or weeks before this hip cap shingle blew off, exposing the framing and attic below. We estimate that this homeowner's roof had been leaking for EIGHT YEARS. Roofing shortcuts may save money in the short term but NEVER pay off in the long run.
 
 
 
This 'roofing' company DID send Ice & Water Shield for the 'roofers' to install in the valleys in an attempt to meet manufacturer and code specifications. Unfortunately, this crew doesn't know the first thing about roofing or proper installation. Allow us to point out a few things: Firstly, the gas vent flue; notice how it is canted to the right? This is because the roofers pulled on it when removing the old roofing and accidentally disconnected it from the gas water heater or fireplace. Now, the gas exhaust and associated fumes will leak into the house or attic. Secondly, the ladder.
 
Ladders (according to OSHA) should extend to three rungs above the fulcrum (eave/gutter line), be tied off/secured, and be tilted so that the feet are back from the wall approximately 1/4 of the height of the fulcrum. If and when a member of the roofing crew falls off this ladder and is hurt, who will pay?
 
The roofing company may carry liability insurance but clearly subcontracted this job to an illegal crew. They may have a general liability insurance policy for the damage that their work causes to the property but most assuredly not damage to a worker. It is highly unlikely that they carry workers' compensation either.
 
Medical bills and lost wages will require the crew member to file suit and the homeowner (or if properly insured, the homeowner's insurance company) will have to pick up the tab. Thirdly, notice the mess. It is apparent that tarps were sent by the roofing company to protect the property during the re-roof but are being uses as little more than a decoration.
 
Wayward debris is allowed to blow in the wind and accumulate in the homeowner's landscaping. This homeowner should not be too surprised when he or she steps on a nail or a lawnmower throws a nail at someone or something they care about.
 
 
 
 


Here you can see HOW the Ice & Water Shield and felt were installed. Unfortunately for this homeowner, Ice & Water Shield MUST be installed directly to the wood decking to properly bond. Also, roofing felt must be installed in lateral courses starting at the eave progressing course by course up the roof - not vertically. Felt must also overlap the Ice and Water shield by at least 6 inches to property direct any moisture that overcomes the shingles into the valley. Based on this installation, the Ice & Water Shield will not seal and any water that ever penetrates the shingles will run down the felt, under the Ice & Water Shield and into the home.
 
 
 
Unfortunately for this homeowner they decided to battle their insurance company on their own and clearly came up on the losing end. The result is patchwork that contributes to a look that is cheap and reduces the 'curb appeal' of their home, invariably devaluing it.
 
Property Casualty insurance is called indemnity coverage because it does not pay a set benefit. It is supposed to pay as much as the policyholder needs (up to the policy limit) to "restore and insured to the SAME financial position after the loss that he or she was in prior to the loss". In the language of insurance, to indemnify someone means to make them whole again.
 
This means that they should not be paid less or more than what it takes to properly restore the home. In this instance, the homeowner bought into the idea that a roof is simply a water-shedding device and completely discounted the financial impact that a reduced 'curb appeal' would have.
 
They accepted less than what would indemnify their property and allowed the insurance company to save money at the expense of their home equity.
 
 
 
The weather was fair in Denver, yet these materials sat on the roof for three weeks before the fellow you see pictured and his partner showed up to start 'working'. More details below.
 
 
 
Based on the age of this home, 'dimes to dollars' the old roof deck is plywood. Yet the installer has chosen to place these cheap wood chip and glue Oriented Strand Boards (OSB) on the roof instead. (In the way the OSB is placed, we could substitute "Wind Missile" for the term OSB). An inordinate amount of materials are stacked on the garage risking permanent damage to this home's framing members.
 
 
 
A hand truck on the roof..
 
Really? Does that sound safe? Clearly this homeowner wanted to cut costs but this extreme is unacceptable. Hiring a roofing company with proper crews that are strong enough to handle the materials in a safe manner should not be a luxury".
 
Okay, that's how the people at Access Roofing feel about their discipline, and the owner's best interest.  I happen to agree with them, and the roofing trade has too many fly by night "jack of all trades" gypsies.
 
If you need a quality, conscientious, roofer in their area, you may want to consider them.
 
Again:


"Access Roofing & Restoration, LLC"

1411 Linwood Blvd. in Oklahoma City.

www.accessroof.com 

405-537-6000

Ask for Mr. Jeff Breeding
 
 
I want to thank Mr. Jeff Breeding for allowing me to bring this information to you.  I'm thinking of bringing a series of consultants, manufacturers, distributors, and contractors of character to you.  We just don't want anything to be an "advertisement" for anyone, because we are beholding to no one.

Fair?
 
I am very thankful for each of you, and the time you spend here with me.  I encourage you to reject negativity in all forms, and always remember to keep looking "UP".
 
Respect.
 
Robert R. "Ron" Solomon
Director, Roof Consultant's Alliance
CCC1325620
 
 
 
 



Tuesday, April 9, 2013

"RPM's TREMCO Nailed by the Feds"

This is an example of how Purchasing Co-Op's operate, and the gluttonous behavior of vendors they support.

In this case, it happens to be RPM, the owner of Tremco (roofing material manufacturer), who sells almost exclusively to government.  In other words, they target schools, an area we can least afford.  RPM (Tremco specifically) is facing almost 70M in fines and restitution.

If they were fined 70M, can you imagine what they actually got away with in overall public contracts?

I could be wrong, but please read the news article, and as always, judge for yourself.

 
8:51 am, April 4, 2013
RPM International Inc. (NYSE: RPM) has reported a big third-quarter loss as the company accounted for the potential cost of an anticipated settlement with the federal government related to an investigation of past roofing contracts with the General Services Administration.
 
 
The Medina-based maker of coatings and sealants said the loss in the quarter that ended Feb. 28 totaled $42.4 million, or 33 cents a share. RPM said the loss mainly was due to an estimated loss contingency of $68.8 million associated with an investigation of roofing contracts between the company's Building Solutions Group and the GSA.

 

RPM said the Building Solutions Group is in ongoing settlement discussions with the Department of Justice and the GSA aimed at resolving the investigation. The company said it is cooperating with the investigation, which involves compliance with certain pricing terms and conditions of GSA contracts under which the Building Solutions Group's roofing division sold products and services to the federal government.

RPM said the ³substantial majority² of the contingency relates to the sale of products and services from 2002 to 2008. The company said the actual amount of the loss, which remains subject to approval by the Justice Department, may vary from the amount of the contingency.
In the third quarter of fiscal 2012, RPM earned $6.6 million, or five cents a share.

Sales at RPM rose 9%, to $843.7 million from $773.6 million.
³With the exception of our roofing division, most of our North American industrial businesses benefited from the gradual economic recovery in the U.S., especially our businesses serving commercial construction markets,"
RPM chairman and CEO Frank C. Sullivan said in a statement.
 
Sullivan is hilarious with his "Nothing to see here folks, just keep moving" act.
 
This is ONLY 2002 through 2008, so I'm wondering about 2009 to Present?  GSA is taking no responsibility, nor do they say Tremco will be removed from their approved vendor list.
All Government Purchasing Co-Op's do this, and their claims of "we save taxpayer money because we buy in bulk', or "you don't have to worry about state "competition laws" because we've handled that for you.
They've handled it alright.  Handled it straight into their own pockets as "commissioned salesmen" who actually make more money from the "No Compete" schemes.  Just imagine.
 
In Oklahoma, "No-Compete Bids INCREASED by 126 MILLION DOLLARS!!  It should have DECREASED, and have no idea how a politician could stand up in a public forum to defend this debauchery.
OKLAHOMA INCREASED NO BID SPENDING BY $126,000,000.00!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
 
 


 



State agencies are spending more money for goods and services without seeking bids, leading some to wonder if the state is getting the best bang for its buck on some contracts.

Spending by state agencies on no-bid contracts increased by 24 percent, to $126 million, in fiscal 2011 compared to the previous year, records supplied by the Office of State Finance show. 

 

In all, some 74 state agencies issued 1,376 no-bid contracts over the course of the year

Contracts were issued without bids for items ranging from $48,000 for photocopiers to $2 million for out-of-state schooling for special education students, a Tulsa World analysis of state reports shows.

In some cases, justification letters required to request the purchase were woefully lacking in detail as required by state purchasing guidelines.


In all of the instances the items or services were lawfully purchased without seeking bids, under the state's "sole source" or "sole brand" acquisition provisions.

State law provides for state agencies to purchase goods and services without seeking bids if the acquisition meets certain guidelines.

A review of sole-source contract reports since 2008 indicates the amount spent by state agencies on no-bid contracts peaked in fiscal year 2009 at $142.6 million.

The total amount spent declined to $101 million in fiscal year 2010 before increasing again in fiscal 2011, which ended June 30.

One state legislator said sole-source contracts should be used sparingly by agencies.  
 
Really, Do Ya Think?

"The only reason that I see that we should do a sole-source contract is when the agency knows there is going to be only one vendor that meets this need," said Rep. Mike Reynolds, R-Oklahoma City.
That is absolutely not the case with roof contracting services.  There are plenty of HONEST MANUFACTURERS, HONEST CONSULTANTS, and HONEST CONTRACTORS that are local, and provide every need.
 
Roofing is not a "SPECIALTY ITEM" any more than concrete, steel, landscaping, or paint.

Reynolds said sole-source designations also may be necessary in an emergency.

"Past that, no, it's just convenient for the agencies not to have to do the paperwork and that's what they are hired to do," Reynolds said.

Another legislator said the issue of sole-source exemptions has not come up recently among lawmakers.

When told about the World's findings, House Rep. Jason Murphey, R-Guthrie, said he intends to press the Office of State Finance for more information on the issue. Murphey has championed ending higher education exemptions from state central purchasing laws.

"There may be a great reason for it and it all makes sense, but I'd like to know that, too," Murphey said, referring to the increase in no-bid contract amounts.

Preston Doerflinger, who is the Office of State Finance director and state Secretary of Finance, said the state purchasing process is being evaluated since the Department of Central Services and three other agencies were consolidated earlier this year.

"I am a big believer in competitive bidding, while recognizing that a sole-source contract may be more cost-effective in some circumstances," Doerflinger said.

"I understand parameters for sole-source contracts are set in legislation. In general, the goal of the OSF will be to ensure taxpayers are receiving the best possible value in the purchase of goods and services by the state."
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
They all TALK about it, but when the lawyers get it to court, have no support from Congress or Senate.
 
There is SO MUCH MONEY BEING WASTED on "No Compete", "Sole Source" contracting or services, that every person in North America should be outraged.
 
Where are our Canadian friends on this?  It is permeating the fabric of your government as well.  ln most cases, 25% of every roofing taxpayer dollar (think schools) is going STRAIGHT into a "Salesman's Pocket".
 
Did that sting?
 
Think about me the next time your children are asked to bring school supplies from home because the school has no money.  Think about me when teachers are laid off, and services cut.
 
The people at RPM "Tremco" may not care about you, but I do.
 
Many industry leaders have reached out to me, and I am working at full throttle to assist them.  Many Consultants, Distributors, and Contractors want to clean up this stain upon the discipline, and we will.
 
I am not hard to find for anyone who wishes to know more about me.  Just type my full Christian name "Robert R. "Ron" Solomon" followed by the words "Sustainability", or "Roofing", and you will see I'm an open book.
 
Here, I am free to tell only the truth.  If anyone ever wishes to correct me, I encourage you to do so.  Please be kind enough to limit your comments based upon science, or public record, as I don't give opinions, nor do I feature them.
 
I am humbled to bring this message to you, and I am on your side.
 
Reject negativity in all forms, and always remember to keep looking "UP".
 
Respect,
 
Robert R. "Ron" Solomon
Director, Roof Consultant's Alliance
CCC1325620

 
 
 

Sunday, March 24, 2013

"Roof Consultant's Institute Protects Taxpayers, and Members"

Needless to say, I am thrilled to see the premier, and undisputed authority on "all things roofing" come out so strongly on the topic of "Exclusion".

These men and women are taking a bold stand to protect taxpayers from predatory business models designed to eliminate all competition for taxpayer dollars.

Purchasing Co-Op's facilitate this horrible deception upon our school districts, and is contrary to all  published state laws.  I can prove this in all 50 states, and every territory, and province of Canada.

Canada too is infested by "Exclusion", resulting in abominable, abusive, taxpayer waste.  Do you wonder why our children are asked to bring writing materials from home?

Based upon all documentation I've seen, investigations, and public record, I will estimate that 40% of every roofing taxpayer dollar is pure waste.  The commissioned salesman puts 30% straight into their pocket!

Canadian taxpayers paying $800.00 for a 5 Gal. bucket of roof coating?

Does that sting?

I guarantee you this topic will not go away, but quickly gain strength. 

Why Ron? 

Because RCI is RIGHT!

Okay, let me turn it over to the Pro's:
 About the Author:

Thomas M. Gernetzke, RRC, RWC, REWC, RRO, RBEC
President, RCI

 

I am pleased to announce Operation Moonshot was officially rolled out at the RCI convention in Orlando. Please see the following excerpt:




"We are facing the single biggest obstacle to our success, and I firmly believe that we will meet this obstacle and turn it to achieve a successful outcome.
Government sector tax-payer funded cooperative procurement and proprietary specifications that exclude our members hurt all of us.
Even if you don’t do government sector work, the waste, fraud, and abuse that frequently result from these procurement methods impacts your taxes and your bottom line.

“We choose to go to the moon.” On May 25, 1961, President John F. Kennedy announced, before a special joint session of Congress, the dramatic and ambitious goal of sending an American safely to the moon before the end of the decade.
At the time, only the construction of the Panama Canal in peacetime, and the Manhattan project in war, was comparable in scope. Many politicians and scientists doubted that this goal could be achieved.

However, on July 20, 1969, Apollo 11 Commander Neil Armstrong stepped off the lunar module ladder and onto the moon’s surface.

Although paling in comparison on every conceivable level, we have a similar challenge:
We choose to establish a goal to involve an RCI professional member on every public school re-roofing project in North America.” With this challenge, I offer Operation Moonshot.

The primary challenge and objective for Moonshot is clear. Significant milestones include:

- Encourage public school decision makers to retain independent third-party consultants and quality assurance observors in the re-roofing process rather than utilizing procurement methods detrimental to our membership.

- Demonstrate the benefits of using third-party consultants for the roofing installation process. These benefits include longer lasting roofs, better designed roofs, code-compliance, validated manufacturer warranties, greater selection of materials, greater energy efficiency and sustainability – all of which mean greater value and benefit for taxpayers.

- Demonstrate that, of third-party consultants, RCI professional members and in particular those with RCI designated registration titles offer the greatest assurances to school districts and tax payers.
- Promote roof maintenance and roof asset management programs.

Clearly this will not be easy. Moonshot will begin with a comprehensive blend of internationally distributed public relations pieces supplemented with direct mailing campaigns targeting school decision makers.

Moonshot will also develop materials, such as direct mail pieces and .pdf documents that individual RCI members can utilize to promote the merits of building envelope consultants for schools and consumers in general".
***                                              ***                                                 ***
I have nothing but praise and admiration of Mr. Gernetzke, and the fine organization Roof Consultant's Institute.

RCI's involvement has been a Godsend to my personal crusade to stop "No Compete Contracts", "Proprietary Specifications", and "Sole Source Agreements" in public works.

Magnificent in scale, and a blessing for taxpayers.

Much respect to Mr. Gernetzke.

As always, I ask you to reject negativity in all forms, and always remember to keep looking "UP".

Respect,

Robert R. "Ron" Solomon                                                                                    
Director, Roof Consultant's Alliance
CCC1325620

Respect to Mr. Jason Fenstermaker.

Please visit us here:



Thursday, February 28, 2013

"Roof Market Data & Trends"

Today, we will examine roofing data and trends.

By now, you know I only provide the information, and you are the judge

Residential (steep slope) data:

REPORT HIGHLIGHTS

·    The North American residential roofing market reached $4.8 billion in 2010 and $5 billion in 2011. It is expected to grow to $6.6 billion by 2016, a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 5.7%.

·    The LW laminate segment reached $2.2 billion in 2010 and $2.3 billion in 2011. It is expected to grow to $3 billion by 2016, a compound CAGR of 5.2%.

·    The three-tab segment reached $940.5 million in 2010 and $966.8 million in 2011. It is expected to grow to $1.2 billion by 2016, a compound CAGR of 4.7%.


SUMMARY FIGURE
NORTH AMERICAN RESIDENTIAL ROOFING MARKET VALUE, 2010-2016
($ BILLIONS)

                     


Numbers must trend downward if we are to make advances in reducing urban heat island effect.

The world standard on "Heat Island Effect" is Lrawrence Berkeley National Laboratories (Dr. Ronnen Levinson, Director):
 

http://heatisland.lbl.gov/


In conjunction, I will also guide you to the presentation papers of the wonderful Dr. Art Rosenfeld:


Very fine examples of eco-friendly steep slope roof systems exist (metal and tile), but they have an expensive initial installed cost.

If we are to be successful in reducing urban heat island effect, we must impart the technology used in commercial low slope roof systems, at a VALUE.

Residential neglect:

The RoofPoint program from the Center for Environmental Innovation in Roofing (Center) is a voluntary, consensus-based green rating system developed to help building owners and designers select non-residential roof systems based on long-term energy and environmental benefits.


RoofPoint serves as a simple, transparent and professional measure to validate that new and replacement roof systems are designed, installed and maintained in accordance with the best sustainable practices available today.

Exclude steep slope roofing.  Why is that?

 
SUMMARY FIGURE
NORTH AMERICAN COMMERCIAL ROOFING MARKET VALUE, 2007-2014
($ BILLIONS)




REPORT HIGHLIGHTS

  • The total value of the North American commercial roofing market is estimated at over $3.2 billion in 2009. This figure is expected to grow at a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 12.7% to reach $5.9 billion in 2014.
  • Hot BUR and green roofing products are expected to have the highest compound annual growth rates (CAGRs) of 24.5% each. Hot BUR will increase in value from $189 million in 2009 to $564 million in 2014. Green roofing will increase from $28 million in 2009 to $83 million in 2014.
  • SPF roofing will have the highest value of nearly $1.1 billion in 2014, from $420 million in 2009, a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 20.6%.

You NEVER want an inscrease in asphaltic roofing products.


And from the fine people at Firestone who were kind enough to furnish this report:


Reject negativity in all forms, and  always  remember to keep looking "UP".

Respect,

Robert R. "Ron" Solomon
Manager, Roof Consultant's Alliance
CCC1325620
RobertRSolomon@aol.com

(Thank you for caring about what I have to say, and I am very appreciative of your comments)




Friday, December 28, 2012

"STOP PAVING OUR ROOFS !!!"


"STOP PAVING OUR ROOFS !!!"


Compilation and Comments by: Robert R. Solomon
(December 11, 2012)
Robert R. "Facts About Roofing Materi               als & The
Environmental (and fiscal) aspects of synthetic white roofing membrane, worker safety, harmful elements of petroleum based roofing, clean water, energy, and taxpayer VALUE. 
This paper is primarily intended for energy/water professionals and other environmental stewards.  The purpose of this presentation is to provide simple physics, scientific evidence, public record, published specifications, as well as illustrate “The Reality of Green Roofing”, and the copious amounts of oil being wasted on archaic and dangerous designs.
We will also touch upon “Public Procurement” methods.  It is absolutely CRITICAL that all Public Servants, FM Directors, Architects, Consultants, read this very important subject of how to provide inclusive and fair bidding for public money.  Private owners are free to do anything they wish with their own money. 
Personal Bio:
State certified roofing contractor CCC1325620 (37 years, retired in 2003), licensed consultant, and conservative environmentalist.  I’ve successfully completed hundreds of public and private projects.  Over the last eight years have participated in the Governor sponsored “Sustainable Florida” and “Sustainable Schools” initiatives as a judge.  “Responsible Conservation” is my theme, with a primary focus on the interface between roof system material, energy reduction, and clean water at a value to taxpayers. I offer my philosophy and research without prejudice.  Comments or observations throughout this presentation are borne by me alone. I am in hopes that I will clearly define my comments from those whom I give full credit and acknowledgement throughout.  Virtually all data is based upon scientific principle, public documents, and state laws. Placing value in your consideration, let us proceed with my observations and end with your conclusions.

Training:  Mr. Charlie Raymond, President NRCA, Mr. Joseph Rutkoski, President FRSA, and Mr. Robert W. Lyons, first and only two time President of RCI.

Clearly understanding the most important role of a roofing contractor is to install systems they are familiar with.  They are tasked with training, equipment, safety, and well being of those they employ and subsequently nourish.  I respect their commitment and cannot reasonably expect them to stand up for ideals, when they have mouths to feed.  I will attempt to do that for them here. 

STATEMENT:

ALL roof systems repel water by their respective design processes.  That is a given.  The purpose of this document is to illustrate how they may also be “Multidimensional” in affording great benefit to occupants of the structure.

Let’s begin with what I refer to as “Paving the Top of a Building” by evaluating the most common, inefficient, of all roofing materials: 

ASPHALT PETROLEUM ROOFING PRODUCTS:

Let us begin with some statistics regarding “Asphaltic Petroleum Roofing Products”.

The Asphalt Roofing Manufacturers Association (ARMA) is the largest petroleum based roofing organization in the United States, and this is their vision:  http://www.asphaltroofing.org/

Specifically:


 History of Asphalt Roofing

Since its discovery more than 5,000 years ago, asphalt has proved to be one of nature's most useful – and abundant – materials.
“Though you may never have considered it, asphalt (a petroleum byproduct), is a naturally occurring part of the environment. (And now thanks to advances in technology, asphalt roofing products are as friendly to the environment as they are to the buildings they protect.)”
No stranger to the building industry itself, asphalt has been used successfully as an excellent natural preservative, as well as an outstanding waterproofing and adhesive agent for centuries. For the past 150 years, in fact, asphalt has proved the most popular roofing material in North America. And deservedly so!


ARMA states:

How many homes are topped by asphalt shingles? Why?

“Asphalt shingles are the leading choice for residential roofing in the United States because they provide quality, durability, versatility and economy. Over 12.5 billion square feet of asphalt shingle products are manufactured annually – enough to cover more than 5 million homes every year. Four out of five homes are roofed with asphalt shingles.
Asphalt shingles offer consumers the broadest array of colors, shapes, and textures available. With an enormous range of styles, asphalt shingles can match almost every type of architectural design and achieve virtually any desired effect – and do it affordably”.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------

May I point out, not one square inch of the 12.5 BILLION sq. ft. produced annually, will ever break down in landfills.  I find it rather troubling that ARMA describes asphalt as “friendly to the environment.  It isn’t.

That 12.5 Billion sq. ft. each year, also translates to 11 Million Tons destined to our landfills.
------------------------------------------------------

Uses of petroleum asphalt:
Road construction
The largest use of petroleum asphalt is for making asphaltic concrete for road construction and accounts for approximately 80% of the petroleum asphalt consumed in the United States.
Roofing shingles
Roofing shingles account for most of the remaining 20% of asphalt consumption in the United States. Most of the petroleum asphalt used in manufacturing shingles is air-blown asphalt.
It is very important to learn the word, and definition of:  “Bitumen”.  Bitumen is synonymous with “Tar Sands”.
 http://ostseis.anl.gov/guide/tarsands/index.cfm

What Are Tar Sands?



            
Tar sands (also referred to as oil sands) are a combination of clay, sand, water, and bitumen, a heavy black viscous oil. 

Tar sands can be mined and processed to extract the oil-rich bitumen, which is then refined into oil. The bitumen in tar sands cannot be pumped from the ground in its natural state; instead tar sand deposits are mined, usually using strip mining or open pit techniques, or the oil is extracted by underground heating with additional upgrading.

Many are misled into thinking the Keystone Pipeline project with Canada is to pump oil.  Only a fraction of oil is extracted, with the rest going to low grade petroleum applications. 
A great deal of energy is consumed in either “strip mining”, or “steam injection” methods necessary to recover the “Tar Sands”, “Residuum”, or “Bitumen”.



Tar sands are mined and processed to generate oil similar to oil pumped from conventional oil wells, but extracting oil from tar sands is more complex than conventional oil recovery. Oil sands recovery processes include extraction and separation systems to separate the bitumen from the clay, sand, and water that make up the tar sands. Bitumen also requires additional upgrading before it can be refined. Because it is so viscous (thick), it also requires dilution with lighter hydrocarbons to make it transportable by pipelines.


Below, you will see the proportionate distribution in terms of refinery.  The portion at the very bottom is called “Residuum”, and that is the material used in asphalt shingles.




About two tons of tar sands are required to produce one barrel of oil. Roughly 75% of the bitumen can be recovered from sand. After oil extraction, the spent sand and other materials are then returned to the mine, which is eventually reclaimed.



Both mining and processing of tar sands involve a variety of environmental impacts, such as global warming and greenhouse gas emissions, disturbance of mined land; impacts on wildlife and air and water quality. 

The development of a commercial tar sands industry in the U.S. would also have significant social and economic impacts on local communities. 

Of special concern in the relatively arid Western United States is the large amount of water required for tar sands processing; currently, tar sands extraction and processing require several barrels of water for each barrel of oil produced, though some of the water can be recycled.
So, now we know a bit more about the materials used to make common asphalt roofing products, you may determine if ARMA’s statement: “Friendly to the environment” is valid.


Tar Sands Resources:

Much of the world's oil (more than 2 trillion barrels) is in the form of tar sands, although it is not all recoverable. While tar sands are found in many places worldwide, the largest deposits in the world are found in Canada (Alberta) and Venezuela, and much of the rest is found in various countries in the Middle East. In the United States, tar sands resources are primarily concentrated in Eastern Utah, mostly on public lands. The in-place tar sands oil resources in Utah are estimated at 12 to 19 billion barrels.


Later, we will discuss the use of a roofing system commonly referred to as “Modified Bitumen”.  Since I’m on “source” materials, and definitions, we will learn about the word “Bitumen”.

bi·tu·men

noun \bə-ˈtyü-mən, bī-, -ˈtü-, especially British also ˈbit-yə-\

Definition of BITUMEN

1: an asphalt of Asia Minor used in ancient times as a cement and mortar
2: any of various mixtures of hydrocarbons (as tar) often together with their nonmetallic derivatives that occur naturally or are obtained as residues after heat-refining natural substances (as petroleum); specifically : such a mixture soluble in carbon disulfide.
Bitumen/asphalt is a naturally occurring, highly flammable substance found in the Dead Sea area. In fact, Josephus refers to the Dead Sea as Lake Asphaltites. It is of interest to note that Josephus writes that the Lake Asphaltites was formed as a result of the devastation that destroyed Sodom and Gomorrah.
Please do follow along, as we will soon make a point.

Biblical references may include:


According to the book of Genesis:
Genesis 6:14   14 "Make for yourself an ark of gopher wood; you shall make the ark with rooms, and shall 1cover it inside and out with pitch.
The ark was painted inside and outside with pitch (tar), symbolizing renunciation (the exterior paint) and purity (the interior paint); by them, man is preserved by the Holy Spirit to glorify God.
And the book of Exodus:  Moses
Exodus 2:3   
But when she could hide him no longer, she got him a wicker basket and covered it over with tar and pitch. Then she put the child into it and set it among the reeds by the bank of the Nile.
We no longer live in Biblical times and have made great technological advancements since “tar” or “pitch” which is my point.

“PAVING your Roof”

A “Petroleum Based Roof” (shingles, modified bitumen) acts as a convection oven “Absorbing” the sun’s radiant energy instead of reflecting it.  Factually, these asphaltic systems may reach 200 degrees F. in hotter climates.  It is not unusual to experience a roof surface temperature increase of 90 degrees F. and beyond.
Why is this important?  It is important because it brings us to realize the phenomena: “Heat Island Effect”.
Recently, I had the great honor of speaking with Dr. Art Rosenfeld, former Director of Lawrence Berkley National Laboratories.

Dr. Rosenfeld has written a voluminous amount of study material illustrating the principle of “Reflectance” vs. “Radiant Absorption” far more than space allows here.  Please do read about him.  You will find his work as fascinating as I have.

Dr. Rosenfeld:




Regarding “White SYNTHETIC roof membranes”, Dr. Rosenfeld says:

“It keeps the city cooler, the Earth cooler and it saves energy,” Rosenfeld said, noting that roofs account for about a quarter of all surfaces in urban areas.

(Photo courtesy of Wal Mart)

Let us not complicate the simple principle of “Radiant Absorption” Vs. “Reflectivity”.  The Greeks have known this principle for many centuries:

Cool Surfaces.
We know that lighter colors keep us cool, since they reflect heat, while darker colors tend to keep us warmer, and so we wear lighter colored clothes in the summer than in the winter. Traditional cultures have exploited this phenomenon – think of the white-washed villages of the Greek islands, where every part of the village, from the walls, to the roofs, to the streets, are painted uniformly white to reflect the scorching rays of the summer sun.


Make sense?

The following statement is absolutely critical, and is the number ONE obstacle I face in getting this message out.  It’s when people see a white granular roof, they believe it is reflecting solar radiation, and that perception is 100% FALSE.  To substantiate this claim:


“The mineral particles typically used for making roofing granules, such as talc, slag, limestone, granite, syenite, diabase, greystone, slate, trap rock, basalt, greenstone, andesite, porphyry, rhyolite, and greystone, generally have low solar heat reflectance, that is, low reflectance of near infrared radiation. Further, the pigments employed for coloring roofing granules have usually been selected to provide shingles having an attractive appearance, with little thought to the thermal stresses encountered on shingled roofs. As a result, the colored roofing granules themselves typically have low solar heat reflectance”.

Read more:


http://www.faqs.org/patents/app/20100151199#ixzz0t7ksL8Kw


Are we clear on this?  Perhaps another illustration will put us over the top:

“The low solar reflectance can be attributed to several factors. First, there is a limited amount of pigment in the granule coating. Also, the roughness of the shingle contributes to multiple scattering of light and thus to increased absorption. Finally, the black asphalt substrate is not 100% covered, and reflects only about 5% of the light which strikes it”.



This is probably the only thing you need to actually remember:  Petroleum based (shingles, modified bitumen, built up) roofs get HOT.  White synthetics DO NOT GET HOT.
  
Absorption of Radiant Energy:
“Radiant energy that strikes a substance can be absorbed, transmitted, or reflected. The radiant energy that is absorbed by a substance is converted into heat or some other form of energy. The amount of energy absorbed depends on the physical nature of the substance and the character of the radiant energy. A mirror reflects most of the light that shines on it, while most of the light that strikes a non tinted glass window is transmitted through the window. Charcoal and soot, on the other hand, absorb virtually all light that strikes them.
The earth's atmosphere absorbs part of the energy radiated by the sun and thus prevents this energy from reaching the earth's surface. If this atmospheric absorption did not occur, life probably could not exist on earth. This is because the atmosphere absorbs ultraviolet rays, some of which are known to be lethal to both animals and plants. Light from distant stars is absorbed both by the atmosphere and by interstellar gas and dust”.
The color of an object that is not self-luminous is determined by the wavelengths of light that the object absorbs, transmits, and reflects.

White synthetic roof system SAVINGS vs. PV efficiency:
Solar collection devices are very intriguing, promising, and I believe the future of great energy independence.
At the moment, it is very inefficient, and costly, prohibiting widespread use.  I also believe when solar collection is commercially available at a reasonable price point (that is, without government subsidy), further research will skyrocket.  The private market and competition will (in my opinion) improve materials, efficiency ratings, and drastically lower costs.

FIRST, we must educate everyone regarding the “Truth” behind roofing systems, and materials.  Let us simply SAVE energy by reflecting radiant energy, and utilizing a principle that costs NO MONEY!
Am I getting the “Reflect Radiant Energy” point across yet?  There will still be a few charts and graphs left, but hopefully we will be 100% clear on this by documents end.
The “White” pigment contained in this system is Titanium Dioxide, and 1 of the top 50 materials produced worldwide.  I will discuss the fire retardant aspect later under “Clean Water”, as it is non toxic.

LEED AP’s and Builders:
White Synthetic Roofs are “GREEN”, and drastically reduce “Heat Island Effect"

 I’m going to go “Real World” on you for a moment, and illustrate the “Bottom Line” from an Owner’s perspective.
The “Private Owner” is far different from the “Public Owner”, as he, or she, is the one actually paying the energy bill with their money, not yours.  The statement by this owner is general, but on average15%-20% SAVED.  He shows how important it is to integrate roofing, HVAC, windows, paint, etc.
 
I will illustrate what that would mean to a “Public” structure, or perhaps a School District.  My School District pays an average of $40,000,000.00 per year in energy costs.  Imagine for a moment how 20% of that money SAVED ($8,000.000.00) could be better spent.

Next, you will see the Owner’s statement, and a very revealing energy model pertaining to schools using petroleum systems.

THE INSTALLED, AND LIFE CYCLE COST, IS LESS THAN A PETROLEUM ROOF!

This note is from the OWNER on a Firestone .060, over R20 Iso, and  20 year NDL warranty.

"Brandon has almost twice as much conditioned space as Tampa (64,229 sq. ft. vs 33,005 sq. ft., respectively) yet from the period of April through July of this year Brandon used 40% less electricity than Tampa; for a savings of $30,367 for the period.  I realize your TPO roof should get most of the credit but we should also consider the "cool-wall" paint on the exterior and the newer/more efficient equipment.  Thanks again for pushing the TPO roof.

Sincerely,
Cleve"

By using a synthetic system, we also saved 36,500 gals. of  petroleum. 

At this same time, by comparison, the Mayor of my city (Tampa, Florida) made front page news by saving 323 gallons in a 1 year period with her Toyota Camry Hybrid. 

Guess who made the front page and who didn't?

Please review the following energy model comparing a white granular modified bitumen roof system to a white TPO.  
The term of the roof warranty and model are a 30 year period, with modeling graciously provided by Carlisle Syntec.

RoofSense Life Cycle Savings Report

Project: Asphalt Built-up VS TPO
Scenario: TPO Savings
Heating and Cooling Data:
The heating and cooling load is referred to as the cost to heat and cool the facility. Following are the details of the buildings system efficiency, fuel type and associated cost used in the energy load calculation.
Cooling Data
Fuel Type: Electricity
System Efficiency: 8 S.E.E.R or E.E.R
Fuel Cost: $0.11 /Kwh
Fuel Inflation Rate: 5.68% per yr
Heating Data

Fuel Type: Electricity
System Efficiency: 65%
Fuel Cost: $0.11 /1000 CF
Fuel Inflation Rate: 5.68% per yr

Baseline Roof A:
Asphalt Built up

Roof Surface Type:
Off-White, Coated or Gravel

Existing Assembly Insulation R: 0
Insulation R to be Added: 20.5
Layer 1: 3.3 inches of Polyiso
Layer 2: n/a

Total Insulation R:  20.5
Proposed Roof B:
White TPO

Roof Surface Type:
TPO White

Existing Assembly Insulation R: 0
Insulation R to be Added: 20.5
Layer 1: 3.3 inches of Polyiso
Layer 2:  n/a

Total Insulation R:  20.5

 

Energy Cost Summary
Estimated Energy Cost:
The energy model within RoofSense compares the estimated energy cost of two roof systems over the term of analysis. Fuel cost and inflation, interior temperature, climate, roof surface type and color, and the amount of insulation utilized are included in the energy cost formulas. The following are estimated energy costs.

Baseline Roof A:
Asphalt Built up C1

Estimated Energy Cost:

Proposed Roof B:
White TPO

Estimated Energy Cost:
Cooling: $1,489,949.92

Cooling: $1,033,798.12
Heating: $612,110.95

Heating: $612,110.95
Total:
$2,102,060.87

Total:
$1,645,909.07





Energy Cost Reduction:  $456,151.80  ( 21.70% )

Environmental Emissions:

Environmental Emissions:
CO2 Carbon Dioxide
355377.8 LBS

CO2 Carbon Dioxide
278260.04 LBS
CH4 Methane
4.6 LBS

CH4 Methane
3.6 LBS
N2O Nitrous Oxide
3.84 LBS

N2O Nitrous Oxide
3 LBS





Carbon Reduction:  77117.76 LBS  ( 21.70% )

Energy Savings Notes:
The RoofSense energy savings model is based on the LC4 Life Cycle cost analysis tool developed by Pat Downey of Merik Professional Roofing Services in the late 1990’s.  The LC4 energy calculations and formulas are taken from the “1989 ASHRAE Fundamentals Handbook”.  Also used was the “Guide for Estimating Difference in Building Heating and Cooling Energy due to Change in Solar Reflectance of a Low-Slopped Roof”, Oak Ridge National Laboratory publication ORNL-6527 and the “NRCA Energy Manual” third edition, National Roofing Contractors Association, Chicago, IL. Adjustments to the formula and reflectance have been made as a result of a benchmarking study completed using Carrier’s “Hourly Analysis Program” (HAP) and ASHRAE’s standards on building simulation. Carrier’s HAP is approved by the government for studies done for the Tax Policy Act of 2005. Historic energy cost data, when used, has been obtained from the Energy Information Agency (EIA)


RESULT: 77,000 lbs. in carbon reduction, and $456,000.00 in energy savings over the term of roof warranty.  

I found this extraordinary, because the client was getting more than a singular dimension roof system.  Up front, and life cycle cost are outstanding.  This was a side by side energy model comparing white granular modified bitumen to white synthetic membrane.  Conditions and insulation were identical.

Wal-Mart is the largest private consumer of energy in North America, and they use it exclusively on all their stores, regardless of location.

http://news.walmart.com/media-library/photos/environment-sustainability/white-roof-skylights-las-vegas-walmart

 White roof and skylights on Las Vegas, Nev. Wal-Mart


Wal-Mart’s white roofs help reduce energy use and have a lower heat island effect than a darker roofing color. The skylights are part of the company’s daylight harvesting system, which can save an average of 800,000 kwh of energy annually.
2009July30: In order to improve energy efficiency, Wal-Mart stores built since 1999 in the US have white roofs. Dark roofs absorb as much as 90% of the sun’s heat, while a white roof can deflect approximately 85% to 90% of the sun’s heat (New York Times, 2009).

Prologis is the leading owner, operator and developer of industrial real estate, focused on global and regional markets across the Americas, Europe and Asia

http://www.prologis.com/en/corporate-responsibility/environmental-stewardship/sustainable-development/design-features.html



"High-reflectance roof membranes – Traditionally, warehouses have black EPDM rubber roofing membranes, which absorb heat from sunlight. White thermoplastic polyolefin (TPO) roofing offers the same performance at essentially the same cost while reducing urban heat island effect and often providing a more comfortable work environment."
I won’t continue driving this point with Target, Staples, etc., as you can see both the sustainability effort, and savings are staggering in scope.

 At this point, I think we’re clear on the energy savings, and value, but I will leave you once again with Dr. Art Rosenfeld:

"White roofs can cut a building's energy use by 20 percent and save consumers money," says California Energy Commissioner Art Rosenfeld. "The potential energy savings in the U.S. is in excess of $1 billion annually. Additionally, by conserving electricity we are emitting less CO2 from power plants," Rosenfeld added.

Together with Rosenfeld, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory scientists Hashem Akbari and Surabi Menon have quantified the effects of white roofs in populated settings in terms of how much carbon dioxide they offset.

Replacing non-reflective, dark roofing materials with white ones on an average house with 1,000 square feet of roof would result in an equivalent CO2 offset of 10 metric tons annually, the scientists estimate.

With an offset value of $25 per metric ton, that could be worth $250, according to European CO2 markets.
Their study is to be published in the scientific journal "Climatic Change."



In reality, I don’t expect many people to care about something they cannot see, but I do care about bringing the facts to you as a roofing professional and concerned citizen.  Now would be a good time to tell you I do not work for anyone, sell anything, buy anything, or promote specific manufacturers.

The topic of “Global Warming” is conspicuously absent in this writing.  

I am not a scientist, nor do I possess the credential necessary to address root mean cause.  But I am a roofer, and will confine the topic to only include things I know by way of research.  

The argument is actually not relevant regarding this subject matter, as I am discussing known, measurable values, and not speculation regarding man’s activity, or the earth’s cyclic warming/cooling patterns. 

This is common sense based upon a common scientific principle.

Reflecting the sun’s radiant energy away from a building is, to me, non-debatable.  If it’s not based upon science, or public record, you will not find it here.  I will leave the trafficking of opinions to others, as I must be able to prove what I say.

WATER:
Water is always associated with fire, so let us address fire retardant additives to Thermoplastic Polyolefin.

Magnesium carbonate, MgCO3, is a white solid that occurs in nature as a mineral. Several hydrated and basic forms of magnesium carbonate also exist as minerals. In addition, MgCO3 has a variety of uses.
MgCO3 is also used in flooring, fireproofing, fire extinguishing compositions, cosmetics, dusting powder, and toothpaste. Other applications are as filler material, smoke suppressant in plastics, a reinforcing agent in neoprene rubber, a drying agent, a laxative to loosen the bowels, and color retention in foods. In addition, high purity magnesium carbonate is used as antacid and as an additive in table salt to keep it free flowing.

MANY people worldwide depend upon their roofs as the only source of fresh water catchment.  A 1,000 sq. ft. roof will produce 600 gallons of fresh water in 1” downfall. 
NO ROOF IS IMMUNE TO JET FUEL EXHAUST, OR AIRBORNE FUNGAL SPORES.  In some areas, there is a vermin problem as well, but we can hope to REDUCE contamination.  Single ply roofs clean easily with “Simple Green”, a garden hose, and push broom.
Roof systems that are favorable to water collection are prefinished metal roofs, clay and concrete tiles, and white synthetic TPO.
Many people ask me if asphalt shingle (petroleum) roofs are suitable for water collection.  I do not feel qualified to provide a definitive answer on this.  Instead, I will share published comments by the world’s largest manufacturer of asphalt shingles, GAF.
Before we see comments, graciously, and honestly provided by GAF, I have a comment.  GAF is one of the most honorable, and reliable manufacturers of residential, and commercial roof systems on the planet.  This is why I choose them as the reference standard on this topic.
You may wish to visit them:  http://www.gaf.com/
The following literature should be considered the industry standard, and I admire them for having the courage to publish it honestly.
Most blame lawn fertilizer, and livestock for the bulk of storm water contamination.  Factually, a great deal of contamination is in the form of phosphorous, and nitrogen, leaching from petroleum roofs.  Of course this starves our water bodies of oxygen, and subsequently inhibits microbial growth.  This sequence prevails itself upward in the food chain, and it’s something we should think about.  It does not have to be this way if we simply “STOP Paving Our Roofs”.
Again, thank you to GAF, an Honorable Manufacturer with excellent roofing products:

SUBJECT:
Reclaimed Water from an Asphalt Shingle Roof

Can I Reclaim Water (Collect Water For Use) Run-off From My Roof?

Yes… But you should only use this water for lawn, shrubbery, and flower irrigation since
water run-off from asphalt shingles is not FDA approved for potable water reclamation
or agricultural use.

What this means…is that because it is not FDA approved, the reclaimed water is not
suitable for:

drinking
cooking
bathing
watering of fruits or vegetables for human consumption

What Should I Know?

Water reclaimed from a shingle roof… may present a variety of hazards that may affect
you or your animal’s health.  While the water may seem “clean”, consider:

Asphalt is processed from crude oil and there are chemicals in asphalt that can be
hazardous to your health if consumed.

The granule surface can collect dirt and other air pollutants which vary by
location… water running over these granules can collect the dirt and pollutants as it runs
off the roof.

Under the correct conditions, algae, mold, moss, and mildew can grow on the
shingle surface. These fungi may be harmful to people and animals when introduced into
a drinking water supply.

Shingles may contain copper oxide, or other algae inhibitors that may harm
aquatic life
.
Where Can I Get More Information?

GAF-Elk Technical Services can assist you… with these and other questions you may
have regarding your new roof installation. GAF-Elk Technical Services can be contacted:

800-ROOF-411 (800-766-3411). Also, the GAF-Elk website is a great resource for just about any question you may have, or for additional information you may require.
That site is at: www.gaf.com

Hopefully, that will bring the topic into focus, as the definitive authority (GAF) has spoken.  Now imagine asphalt roofing for the millions whose lives depend upon rain water catchment from their roof alone.


An excellent discussion regarding conservation of fresh water is brought to us by the good people at National Geographic:

Less than 1 percent of Earth's water is drinkable. In America, water is relatively plentiful, and a typical household uses approximately 260 gallons of water every single day. Tap water has to be processed, which takes energy and costs money. The more water that is used, the more it costs environmentally and financially”.



Collecting water from petroleum based roofs is not unlike collecting water from an asphalt paved road.  Those little “rainbows” we see in puddles after the rainstorm are not our friends.

The Chief Geologist of an International Civil Engineering Firm told me that so much bacteria is “washed out” in a rainstorm that children should not be allowed to play outside until 2 hours afterward.

Perhaps if we consider fresh water our most valuable commodity, we will make informed decisions regarding its preservation.

In addition to sharing the environmental impact petroleum based roofing has, I am also trying to offer value laden options to it.  So far, we’ve talked about huge energy savings, and clean water.
 
WORKER SAFETY: 
The number one cause of all roofing injury claims is “Soft Tissue Damage”.  This is not surprising, as they are routinely lifting over 250 lbs. per 100 sq. ft. of asphalt shingles, or lifting 100 lb. rolls of modified bitumen, and 100 lb. cartons of asphalt all day.  We amplify an EXTREME environment for them by introducing 450 degree F. molten asphalt to the equation.  Or, propane torches in the case of modified bitumen.

In a DOE video, Dr. Steven Chu says:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q0GKcdgxHsk

Why the industry urgency to move toward the use of materials such as TPO? Because white roof membranes help reduce both energy requirements and costs for cooling - a reason that sits well with building owners as well. And according to Patrick Downey, CSI, RRC, president of Atlanta's Merik Inc., a roof consulting firm that specializes in energy efficiency, "White and light roof studies throughout the Sunbelt have demonstrated that the savings in hot/warm weather cooling costs more than offset the slight increase in cold/cool weather heating costs."
In contrast, the dark, heat-absorbing roofing of days gone by is associated with a condition known as the "urban heat island" effect and is also linked with hazardous ozone levels. Both of these conditions, coupled with a reduction in natural shading, contribute to a considerable increase in metropolitan area temperatures and, hence, higher energy bills.
To facilitate the move toward mandating white roofing, components of regulations such as the ASHRAE 90.1 Energy Efficient Standards indicate that  

white roof membranes can now be used in place of additional 

insulation to reduce cooling energy consumption in some instances. 

I ABSOLUTELY DISASGREE WITH WHOMEVER TOLD THIS TO DR.
CHU.
NEVER CHEAPEN A ROOF WITH LESS INSULATION.  THE SAVINGS
 ARE MINIMAL COMPARED TO THE BENEFIT.

Similarly, in the state of Georgia, precedent-setting white roofing legislation known as the Georgia White Roof Amendment was passed to enforce the same standards. On a national scale, the U.S. Department of Energy and the Environmental Protection Agency are now funding efforts to encourage the use of white roofing.
While the white TPO material can help save on building cooling costs, this benefit is just one of the many environmentally sound attributes of the single-ply roofing membrane. From initial raw materials manufacturing to disposal at the end of the system's useful life, TPO offers product features that pose less of an adverse impact on the general environment than other popular single-ply roofing materials.

Following is a quick look at why TPO is an environmentally sound,

front-row leader in the move toward white and light-colored

* TPO's raw materials are created in sealed reactors without production of hazardous by-products.
* TPO's manufacturing process ensures that scraps or reject materials are immediately recycled into the product stream.
* TPO is hot-air welded; therefore, no smoke or strong fumes are produced during application.
* Unlike PVC, TPO contains no migratory plasticizers that leak 

into the air and/or storm-water runoff.
In addition to its environmental desirability, TPO provides the weather ability of an EPDM and the superior seam strength of PVC - translating into savings in maintenance and repair. The result: more green all the way around.
Explanations are courtesy of the National Roofing Contractors Association and Duro-Last Roofing Inc., Saginaw, Mich.

Metal Roof systems:

Metal roof systems (along with clay tile) are probably the most aesthetically pleasing of all roof systems.  They come in a variety of base materials (copper, steel or aluminum), and have an outrageous range in terms of color palette selections.
There are just too many styles and applications for me to properly address here, but we’ll take a look at some beautiful examples.


The “Life Cycle Cost” is superior to any brand, make, or series of asphalt shingles.  These roofs require a higher level of competency in installation, and flashing details are critical.

The “Color” you see is a bonding resin technique commonly referred to as “Kynar 500”.
It’s best if I let them describe the process here:  

http://www.kynar500.com/

For those of you involved with large commercial structures, you will be doing yourself a disservice by going “cheap” with painted galvanized flashings.  ESPECIALLY drip edges, gutter, downspouts, copings, because they WILL RUST PREMATURELY.  The Kynar 500 type coatings (available by all metal panel manufacturers as the industry standard) come with a free (typically) 20 year “Finish Warranty”. 

Fact is, the roof will almost certainly last beyond your lifetime, and it will be your last roofing adventure.
Metal roofs are recyclable, and they do not contaminate storm water. 
Many colors and pigment technologies far surpass the .29 reflection requirement of LEED.  This is critical because you (dependent upon color) will meet energy rebate requirements.
This is an excerpt from PG&E’s cool roof rebate program:

http://www.pge.com/myhome/saveenergymoney/rebates/remodeling/coolroof/

 PG&E's 2010-2012 rebate program is available for qualifying products purchased and installed between January 1, 2010 and December 31, 2012. Payment of rebates is not guaranteed as funds are limited, and amounts and offerings are subject to change. All rebate program terms and conditions apply.

Type
Aged Solar Reflectance
Aged Thermal Emittance
Rebate Amt
Low Slope
(excluding CZ 13)
≥ 0.55
≥ 0.75
$0.20/sq. ft.
≥ 0.35
≥ 0.75
$0.20/sq. ft.
≥ 0.25
≥ 0.75
$0.10/sq. ft.
For a complete list of qualifying products, visit www.coolroofs.org
The roof rebate program is probably the most effective energy incentive I’ve been able to find.  This roof will continue to reduce your energy demand for many years.  The same thing is true of attic insulation, or insulation of any kind.
We want to first reflect the sun’s radiant energy at the roof surface, and whatever thermal stress that passes will be effectively blocked by a minimum “R” = 20.0.  A thermal coefficient of “R” = 30.0 is far preferred, and the cost is pretty insignificant.

In my case, the rebate included sealing of duct work, and an additional “R” = 11.0 blown fiberglass into my attic, as I already had “R” = 20.0.  My home is 2,500 sq. ft. and the total out of pocket cost was $150.00 to me.  My energy bill has been $100.00 per month LESS on a very regular basis.  So, after 6 weeks, my $150.00 had been returned to me in the form of savings.
 
I cannot emphasize the value of passive methods like attic insulation and reflectivity enough.  By far, the best investment you can make to your home, your wallet, and your comfort.

“Emissivity”

Definition of EMISSIVITY

: the relative power of a surface to emit heat by radiation : the ratio of the radiant energy emitted by a surface to that emitted by a blackbody at the same temperature
Rather than bludgeon you with copious data here, it is essentially the ability of something to release the energy it has absorbed.

Petroleum based roof systems absorb a great deal of energy, and retain it well into the evening.  Metals, synthetics, and most tiles do not.  Below, you qill find the most comprehensive body of work that exists on the topic.  The “Heat Island Group” at Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratories has no equal.

http://heatisland.lbl.gov/
 
This roofing primer is general of course, and hopefully touched upon an area of interest for you. 

Since the document is also for those in public service, purchasing, and procurement, I am especially interested in law governing what we can and can’t do.  

Remember, the government is not an “owner” in the traditional sense.  Taxpayers are in fact the “owners” of all public structures.

For the time being, I will leave you to ponder "Tar Sands", and why people feel the need to put petroleum on the TOP of buildings.

Reject negativity in all forms, and always remember to keep looking "UP".

Respectfully,

Robert R.Solomon
CCC1325620 (Florida State Certification)
Public Procurement Analyst
Licensed Roofing Consultant