Friends:
Public Procurement is a nightmare for the average human brain: The pompous attitudes, self important school board members, Superintendents, and those who decimate school maintenance budgets through "Bid Rigging".
Anything you need to know about this incredible scam is contained on this site, Use keywords: School Scam, Purchasing cooperatives exposed, Tremco, Garland, u.s, Communities, School roofing, etc. in the search box (upper left corner of this page.
Okay, let's get started with the rant. I don't know if a rant backed by public record is a rant at all. I just research, and write about public roofing scams. You are the judge, and I welcome constructive criticism.
I don't traffic in opinions, emotions, or personal gain. Simply put, I am in the "Fairness"Business".
Gag Sheet Metal & HVAC sues school district for "Exclusion" of competition..
How many examples of "sole source", "Proprietary Specifications", "no compete" and Purchasing Cooperative manipulation must I provide? Your schools, and all publicly funded projects are soft targets for this "Roofing Scam".
http://www.nujournal.com/news/local-news/2016/12/28/gag-sheet-metal-sues-school-district
Gag Sheet
Metal sues school district
CONNOR CUMMISKEY
Staff Writer
ccummiskey@nujournal.com
NEW ULM — Gag Sheet Metal (GSM) Incorporated is
suing Independent School District (ISD) 88 over alleged infractions that
favored its competitor Tremco Incorporated.
On Thursday, Dec. 22, GSM filed a complaint alleging that ISD
88’s bidding process for the partial reroofing of the middle school was not
neutral in execution.
GSM alleges that Tremco had an advantage in the bidding process
because the type of roof it provides was the preferred roof type in the plan,
due to Tremco being involved in the drafting process.
GSM provides ethylene propylene diene monomer rubber (EPDM)
roofs. EPDM consists of sheets of durable rubber laid across the structure.
Seams are sealed with liquid adhesives or specialized tape.
Tremco customarily provides built-up roofs, consisting of sheets
of saturated felt cemented together with asphalt, then covered in a “cap sheet” of asphalt or pitch surfaced with gravel or
rock.
The complaint cites numerous points of the plan as putting
increased costs on EPDM roofs for “no scientific
or engineering reason.”
Alleged discrepancies include but are not limited to:
• The built-up style requires one-eighth inch of insulation per
foot, whereas EPDM requires one-quarter inch.
• The built-up style is allowed to keep current insulation on
most of the roof where EPDM must strip the roof down to the structural deck.
• Built-up requires installers with five years experience, but
10 years of experience is needed for EPDM.
• A flood test, required only for EPDM roofs, calls for the roof
to be sealed and two and one-half inches of water left for 48 hours.
James Strommen, lead attorney for the district, said in a phone
call Tuesday that ISD 88 has every right to decide a specific design in such
situations.
"Public bodies are entitled to determine designs and equipment for the good of the people" , Strommen said.
That statement is patently false. They may provide a "Standard", include 4 manufacturers, and competitively bid the project. "Competition" includes manufacturers, and contractors who routinely work together.
If Mr. Strommen were right, all public officials would have a "Right" to buy Mercedes 600's, without question. I know how absurd that sounds, but Mr. Strommen cannot explain a "sole source" competition for taxpayer money. It is against the law, and Counsel knows it.
My question is why administrators fight to the death for unscrupulous vendors, and Purchasing Cooperatives. I'll express this sentiment to Mr. Strommen personally, and post his reply ASAP.
This argument I will win every single time. My position is impossible to argue against, and I know it.
The administrators do not have "Rights'. The taxpayers own the buildings, and ground they sit on. Administrators are paid by taxpayers to be responsible custodians of OUR money. Mr. Strommer has absolutely no authority to exclude competition.
“Public bodies are entitled to
detemine designs and equipment for the good of the people,” Strommen
said. He added that multiple companies are expected to bid, thus
Tremco has no exceptional advantage in the bidding process.
By "multiple companies", I'm assuming Tremco Applicators. Tremco is a manufacturer, and not a contractor. Why not include manufacturers that Contractors are trained, and equipped to install? Contractors that spend huge sums of moneyon safety programs, training, etc. They are the ones who have "Rights" to compete for their own tax dollar.
The lead attorney for GSM was unavailable for comment before
print time.
The complaint astlhe plan.o alleges that a Tremco employee had a
supervisory role in the drafting of the plans presented at a Dec. 6 meeting of potential contractors
indicated they had been drawn by a “BDK” and
approved by “R. Palmer.” The
complaint alleges that R. Palmer is Ryan Palmer, a senior field representative
for Tremco, who represented Tremco at the meeting.
The complaint alleges that without a signature assuring that the plans had been drafted by a licensed architect or engineer, ISD 88 broke
state law.After the Dec. 6 meeting contractors received another copy of
the documents that lacked the BDK and R. Palmer references. Instead they bore
the stamp and e-signature of Terrance Duffy, a licensed engineer.
The signature stated that the plans had been “reviewed by (Duffy) or under (Duffy’s) direct supervision.”
The signature and stamp do not bring the documents back in line
with the law, according to the complaint.
“That assertion does not comply
with the requirements of state law, that the plans and specifications,
including these drawings, be prepared by a licensed architect or engineer,” stated
the complaint.
GSM seeks to stop the bid opening process that had been
scheduled for Thursday, Dec. 29. The company also seeks to prevent any bids
being awarded until the plans are prepared by a licensed engineer and provide
equivalent requirements for both styles of roof.
A motion hearing is scheduled for 9:30 a.m. Wednesday, Dec. 28,
in the Nicollet County Court House (501 S. Minnesota St., St. Peter).
Connor Cummiskey can be emailed at ccummiskey@nujournal.com.
----------------------------
Much respect to the Author of this article, Mr. Connor Commiskey.
I would suggest thanking him for the article, and the article has a place for your comments.I should have a comment posted by tomorrow, and you are welcome to follow my lead. Please take note of the money, and savings involved, Fairly typical of public projects, and especially schools.
We want to compete for our own tax dollars, and feed our families, not be forced to "cheat" the public to get work. We know it's illegal, and do not enjoy the position we're in. Purchasing Cooperatives LIE to you about being competitive. I alone can buy material at much lower prices, give a much better manufacturers warranty, and have the entire system comes with a 30 year labor, and material warranty. If your roof leaks, or needs replacement during the warranty term, the manufacturer will fix it for free.
Who do you want standing by you, GAF, Firestone, Johns Manville, Carlisle Syntec, or Tremco? Tremco was fined $51,000,000.00 by the DOJ for abusing GSA contracts. Now Tremco is being sued by the SEC for lying. The suit is against Trremco, and their Attorney.
DOJ Case::
https://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/rpm-international-inc-and-tremco-inc-pay-nearly-61-million-failing-provide-government
SEC Case:
https://www.ohio.com/akron/business/manufacturing/rpm-international-fighting-new-sec-lawsuit-alleging-fraud
GAF, Firestone, Carlisle Syntec, and Johns Manville are honorable manufacturers, and preferred by anyone in the roofing industry. They would welcome Garland, and Tremco to any bid list.
Please don't take my word for any of this, and simply type "School Roofing Scam" into your browser, and see what comes up. Then, do the same on YouTube. You will only find Tremco, and Garland in the investigative reports. All of this "arranged:" of course by the Purchasing Cooperative. U.S. Communities is disgraceful, and at one time had 55 pages of BLANK LINE ITEMS as their Garland 'Competitive Pricing". USC are liars, and I can prove it to anyione who wishes to comment, or contact me. I forgot to mention that Cobb County (Georgia) Commission gets a 5% "kickback" in the scam, and here's the actual contract verbiage:
I don't make this stuff up folks", and if you look closely, EVERYBODY is getting a piece of the pie, while taxpayers suffer. These are lying Cobb County Commissioners, and lying U. S. Communities.
5% kickback is beyond arrogance, and lustful greed. Everybody imn Cobb County should know this, and Commissioner Joe Tommie is at the center of it all. I've written to him many times, and was incensed when I saw an article in American City and County featuring Joe Tommie, shilling for Garland.
NO PUBLIC ADMINISTRATOR HAS THE RIGHT TO EXCLUDE COMPETITION. tHEY MAY NOT GIVE EVEN THE SLIGHTEST HINT OF FAVORITISM. IT IS AGAINST THE LAW IN ALL 50 STATES.
Anyway, here are the fine Cobb County Commissioners stuffing their pockets with 5% "Kickback" that YOU are paying for. For them, I feel nothing but contempt.
“5.1 Administrative Fees. Supplier shall pay to U.S. Communities a monthly
administrative fee based upon the total sales price of all purchases shipped
and billed pursuant to the Master Agreement, excluding taxes, in the amount of
two percent (2%) of aggregate purchases made during each calendar month
(individually and collectively, “Administrative Fees”). Supplier’s annual sales
shall be measured on a calendar year basis. All Administrative Fees shall be
payable in U.S. Dollars and shall be made by wire to U.S. Communities, or its
designee or trustee as may be directed in writing by U.S. Communities.
Administrative Fees shall be due and payable within thirty (30) days of the end
of each calendar month for purchases shipped and billed during such calendar month.
U.S. Communities agrees to
pay to Lead Public Agency five percent (5%) of all Administrative Fees
received from Supplier to help offset Lead Public Agency’s costs incurred in
connection with managing the Master Agreement nationally.”
NOTE: Retired 2003, do not solicit nor accept compensation, or personal advancement of any kind.
Before I get further into this, want you to know the two main "Vendors" are Tremco, and Garland. I have no dislike for their salesmen who are only trying to make a living. My beef is with their "Corporate Model;" which is to exclude any, and all competition. NO "COMPETITION EVER EXISTED, OR OCCURRED".
Roofing, nor any other construction trade should allow administrators, or purchasing cooperative to pick winners and losers through "Exclusion".
The good people at Gag Roofing and Sheet Metal properly bid this project fairly, competitively, and in good faith. This is what the taxpayers need, and deserve. This practice is decimating school maintenance budgets across the US, Canada, and UK. To an uninformed person, or "layman, could see how shiny pamphlets could be soothing. You will not feel "soothed" when you are disgraced in If you ever hear "WE HANDLE IT ALL", Run away at top speed.
I do not want Garland, or Tremco excluded from any bid list. I want them to "Compete", just like the rest of us. To get the best price you must contact the "Majors". GAF, Firestone, Carlisle, Johns Manville. Ever heard of them? No? Let me bring you up to date:
1.) GAF - Worlds largest roofing material manufacturer.
Firestone - Backed by Billions in Bridgestone assets.
Johns Manvillwe: A Berkshire Hathaway Co.
Carlisle Syntec:
There are many more, but can you image any reason that should preclude competitors like that? My best suggestion is to offer a "Voluntary Alternate" to any closed specification project. The school board, or public entity will see the difference between true competition, and "sole source" contracts.
Images below:
http://www.nujournal.com/news/local-news/2016/12/28/gag-sheet-metal-sues-school-district
Click to enlarge NRCA statement, or click the link above.
Roofing is not a "Specialty" trade, and brand name (the ones I've illustrated) are readily available at local roofing supply house. NOTE: You are retaining approximately 70% .of your local tax dollar. Garland, nor Tremco have distributors, and are not locally stocked.
If you're not competitive in the private market, you are not competitive in the public market. Period.
Please read this, and understand it's happening all over the place. I hear about it all the time from respected sources, and publications, in all 50 states. The Roofing Discipline deserves better than me, but from what I know, the Cavalry is preparing to saddle up. One example is : National Roofing Contractors Association (NRCA) position paper:
Again: NOTE: Retired 2003, do not solicit nor accept compensation, or personal advancement of any kind.
Please understand I have zero financial interest in any of this (except my taxes). Everything I say is supported by public record, or accepted science.
I would like to thank the honorable people at Gag Sheet metal for their courageous stand. Here, we do not advertise, or prefer one vendor over another, all things being equal. In this case, I think Gag deserves credit, and I'm going to give uit.
GAG Sheet Metal:
https://www.gagsheetmetal.com/aboutus.html
They are good people, a great asset to the community, and I'd recommend them to anyone within their territorial scope of operations
I think GSM deserves the love, so I'm going to give it to them.
Much Respect.
You honor our Brothers, and Sisters of the roofing discipline,and we are proud of you. GSM transcends the stereotypical roofer image, and we need more like them.
Thank you GSM.
NOTE: Retired 2003, do not solicit nor accept compensation, or personal advancement of any kind.
Reject negativity in all forms, and always remember to keep looking "UP".
Robert R. Solomon
Public Procurement Analyst
Florida State Certified
CCC1325620
RobertRSolomon@aol.com
