Tuesday, January 16, 2018

U. S. Communities Roofing Scam. How it works, and who it hurts.

Friends;

This is going to be a long one, but I think you can see, or figure out, the scam between U.S. Communities, and Garland.  It's a full blown scam, and the proof is contained in this post.  

From fake claims of being "competitive", the 5% kickback for County Commission of Cobb County, Georgia, and my favorite:  Public administrators have a "Right" to buy anything they want.  You can't help but wonder why they don't all drive Mercedes 600's.  



Public Procurement in this country is out of control.  When I speak to an administrator, district, and contractors who participate in the scam seem to come at me like locusts.  The only reason I do this research, and publish my findings, is for those of you who are "Excluded" from competition.  No competition is decimating school maintenance budgets throughout all of North America, and the United Kingdom.

Normally, The scam is a Purchasing Cooperative, Tremco or Garland, a willing administrator (who is neither credentialed, experienced, or know a single thing about modern roofing technique).  Subsequently, they are responsible for creating a scam that overcharges by 50% (some higher, some a bit lower).

NOTHING ABOUT THE PURCHASE IS "COMPETITIVE".  Garland was awarded the U.S. Communities contract by submitting 55 pages of blank line items.

I can't grasp the hundreds of millions of dollars wasted on absolutely nothing, but a salesman's pocket (25%).  There is nothing Garland or Tremco make, that all mainstream manufacturers can't equal, or exceed.

Sorry for the copious reading, and lack of white space.  


By:  Robert R. Solomon,

Education Resources

U.S. Communities purchasing cooperative has a long history of working with thousands of K-12 public and private schools, community colleges and higher education institutions to save time and money. The U.S. Communities Advisory Board includes several school districts and university representatives. Moreover, U.S. Communities is the only cooperative purchasing program founded by the Association of School Business Officials International, the National Association of Counties, the National Institute of Governmental Purchasing, the National League of Cities and the United States Conference of Mayors.

All U.S. Communities contracts are competitively solicited by a lead public agency in accordance with its public purchasing rules and regulations. Each solicitation contains language allowing public and private schools and institutes of higher education to piggyback on the contracts.
Save money
Education organizations are qualified to utilize U.S. Communities’ contracts to save significant time and costs while realizing bid competitive pricing. Furthermore, the prices your institution will receive through U.S. Communities are the lowest that will be offered by participating suppliers to government entities nationwide. With no cost to participate and no minimum order requirements, education organizations of any size have the ability to purchase the products, services and solutions they need at volume discount prices that would be nearly impossible to attain individually.
Save Time
Although each school may have different procedures to follow for private or public education procurement, applying these competitive principles satisfies the competitive solicitation requirements of most agencies and organizations. By using U.S. Communities suppliers, there is no need to comparison shop. You can buy with confidence knowing you are getting the lowest overall government pricing. You'll be able to leverage our cooperative purchasing standards and supplier commitmentsto deliver v

Today, we will read Garland’s own words, and I’ll tell you what they actually mean.  
My favorite is  “Our customers in the public sector not only have the right to choose the roofing system that best fits their needs, but an obligation to ……”  . 
They are wrong.  Taxpayers have “Rights”, and public sector administrators have responsibility as stewards of taxpayer money.   They are charged with achieving two goals when purchasing a publicly funded structure:   “Serviceability, and Value”.   Neither goal may be achieved when buying through a purchasing cooperative.  Put mildly, it’s stupid.  Okay, let’s get to Garland’s “Claims”, in their words.

Alleged Garland Roofing Scams: What You Should Know About Competitive Bidding in Public Projects

For over 100 years, the Garland Company has focused on building our business around quality products, services and people. Our representatives boast a record for knowledge, service and integrity that speaks for itself. From the ground up, we are owned by our employees, so there is additional incentive by everyone at every level to deliver the best products and services.

Every successful company has its critics and ours claim that Garland scams its roofing customers by engaging in deceitful practices. These claims could not be further from the truth. As part of our company policy of transparency, we would like to set the record straight as these claims about Garland roofing scams have no merit.

By ‘Critics”, they mean “taxpayers”.  They absolutely deceive people, and are therefore “deceitful’.

Garland Roofing Complaints: Over-Built and Over-Charged

Because of our commitment to offering clients the best product possible, Garland roofing materials may initially cost more than the average roofing solution. All of our roofs are designed to provide long-lasting protection, which has resulted in a high demand for our products from customers who need long-term performance the most: public schools and hospitals. Our customers understand the long-term value they get when they choose Garland and know that an investment in our systems and services will result in roofs that last on average 10 years longer than lower priced options. After choosing Garland materials, our customers can rest easy knowing we will be there to support them for the life of their buildings.

Our customers in the public sector not only have the right to choose the roofing system that best fits their needs, but an obligation to community members to choose the system that lasts long and performs well. It is no surprise that when given a choice, they frequently choose a Garland roofing system and we're happy to provide local hospitals and schools with exceptional products and services that last.

Garland ADMITS they are higher priced, and comments regarding other manufacturers are incorrect, and unsubstantiated.

Public administrators DO NOT HAVE A RIGHT to choose anything they want.  Government doesn’t own anything, and it’s the taxpayer who has a “right” to know.  

ALL public projects are subject to oversight.  Notice “Performance Based”.  WHO has determined “Performance”, WHAT credential allows them to address it, and WHICH mainstream manufacturer (GAF, Firestone, Johns Manville, Carlisle Syntec, etc.) were they “compared to”?

Garland Roofing Complaints: Performance Specifications and Spec Writing

Some Garland roofing complaints include accusations that our sales representatives write specifications that require the use of Garland products. We promote performance-based specifications because they ensure a level playing field for competitive bidding. Proprietary specifications are seldom permitted in the public market and are generally discouraged. Our seasoned sales representatives make recommendations based on their years of experience. When followed, these recommendations create long-term performance outcomes.

100% FALSE.   Garland representatives INSIST upon it.  See it on Video:

Actual words published by a Garland representative:

This is directly from an application I received (05-10-2013)
“The Garland Company"

As a consultant for The Garland Company, I developed relationships with high-end, governmental, educational, and municipal clients to assist them in managing their roof assets.

The Garland Company is a premium roofing manufacturer that values the relationship-based sales approach.

After a three week immersive training program, I was charged with completing inspections and forensic roof evaluations for companies and clients like: Lockheed Martin, The Dallas County Community College District, The City of Dallas, The City of Mesquite, Raytheon, Texas Instruments, Dell, Air Liquide and others of similar merit.

As part of my duties I worked closely with architects, designers, and specifiers to ensure that The Garland Company’s line of products was the only roofing manufacturer named in the specification or offered to the client.

Upon completing the design phase, I would solicit bids from qualified, local roofing contractors to perform the work under my consult and supervision.

Design Build Solutions - The Garland Company

Design Build Solutions is The Garland Company's design and construction arm. Prior to 2006, it was a vastly underused entity created to control specifications through the bid process. However, once arwarded The US Communities Buying Co-Operative Contract in 2006, I saw a massive opportunity to do much more than control specifications.

I began marketing and actively soliciting projects to be designed and built by DBS all over Texas.

Working mostly on military contracts, I marketed our design capabilities to The Office of The Surgeon General, The Army Core of Engineers, and The Office of Veterans' Affairs.

Most of our projects were small, multi-family base housing and medical center upgrades. As DBS was not "completely" set up to handle large, multi-disciplinary bids, I solicited bids, evaluated sub-contractors, and engaged in buy-out and VE process with subs and owners.

Soon, it became necessary to create budgetary checks and balances. I implemented a customized version of a project management software created for me by Podio and created and managed construction budgets using Quickbooks Contractor Suite.

A change in Garland's Scope of WOrk under The US Communities Contract lead them to stear me away from Design-Build projects. As I had created valuable relationships in the industry, I chose to start XXXXXXXX  with a group of like-minded construction professionals to continue pursuing larger contracts and to branch further into the private sector”.


Garland Roofing Complaints: Cooperative Purchasing

Some Garland roofing complaints involve cooperative purchasing, claiming purchasing co-ops restrict competitive bidding and cost tax payers more. This is simply not the case. Public procurement administrators use cooperative purchasing vehicles to expedite project delivery, simplify contract administration and reduce associated costs. All cooperative purchasing contracts used to purchase Garland materials have been publicly bid on at a national or state basis in full compliance with existing federal and state laws. The popularity of this purchasing option suggests that the public entities who use cooperative purchasing agreements find them beneficial to the communities they serve.
If you still have questions about Garland roofing problems you may have read about, please contact Garland today.”
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Mr. Tommie:

Type “School Roofing Scam” into your browser, and then do the same on YouTube.  You will find no shortage of investigative reports on Garland there.

USC gets very bad press in “Ripoff Report”:

http://www.ripoffreport.com/r/US-Communities-Government-Purchasing-Alliance/nationwide/Cooperative-Government-Purchasing-US-Communities-the-truth-behind-a-national-scam-All-478352

It is strange that so many intertwined enterprises are located in the same office suite and are run by Stephen (Steve) Hamill and Jerry Burke.

More concerning is the fact the U.S. Communities has a $700 million dollar a year contract with Office Depot for office and classroom supplies.


Office Depot has provided over $20 million in kickbacks to U.S. Communities (read Stephen Hamill and his partner Jerry Burke). 
------------------------------------------------



WOW!!
For now, I’ll leave you with:
State of New Jersey
Commission of Investigation
I’m sure you’ve read this report, but I am not defending “singular” items, but a fact pattern.
Garland came out with their “we’re not guilty” tour after Tremco took that $61,000,000.00 hit.  After I reported on the videos, Garland took them down.    All that “Honesty”.
I’m paraphrasing, but can provide links to the deleted videos.  Perhaps you have an access code that nobody else has?
Regardless, here is more public record that is easily available:
US Communities News and Events- note sponsorship of events and production of webinars:

US Communities complimentary “Strategic Sourcing Summits”

Cobb County Purchasing Department is listed as “Lead Agency” for roofing on US Communities website and appears to solicit the nationwide roofing contract

US Communities website states “No User Fees – no costs or fees to participate”, but reading the Cobb County/US Communities agreement please note on page 56 of the pdf item 5.1 under Administration Agreement in this contract and share 5% of their fee with Cobb County Purchasing:

“5.1 Administrative Fees. Supplier shall pay to U.S. Communities a monthly administrative fee based upon the total sales price of all purchases shipped and billed pursuant to the Master Agreement, excluding taxes, in the amount of two percent (2%) of aggregate purchases made during each calendar month (individually and collectively, “Administrative Fees”). Supplier’s annual sales shall be measured on a calendar year basis. All Administrative Fees shall be payable in U.S. Dollars and shall be made by wire to U.S. Communities, or its designee or trustee as may be directed in writing by U.S. Communities. Administrative Fees shall be due and payable within thirty (30) days of the end of each calendar month for purchases shipped and billed during such calendar month. U.S. Communities agrees to pay to Lead Public Agency five percent (5%) of all Administrative Fees received from Supplier to help offset Lead Public Agency’s costs incurred in connection with managing the Master Agreement nationally.”

There are also provisions in the vendor agreement that appear to be more applicable to an organization that is trying to maximize sales vs. a cooperative that is trying to save its users money, such as:

“(d) Sales Commitment. Supplier shall market the Master Agreement through Supplier’s sales force or dealer network that is properly trained, engaged and committed to offering the Master Agreement as Supplier’s primary offering to Public Agencies. Supplier’s sales force compensation and incentives shall be greater than or equal to the compensation and incentives earned under other contracts to Public Agencies.”




Cobb County is listed on US Communities Advisory Board:
Imagine that.
 Another whistleblower case involving procurement through cooperative:




 Interesting article about an association that has come out against sole-source contracting due to the above case:


 You might want to ask your friends in Cobb County what to do about Garland, now that I’ve notified you of such an obvious problem.  This is not “isolated” stuff, and CLEARLY outlines your deceptive “for profit” scheme to defraud taxpayers.

This is ONE example of mail I get all the time, and from all across the country:

Brother Ron,
The bid was just awarded for the roofing at the middle school.
Together we saved the taxpayer over 410 k!! Once Garland/ Tremco were exposed,with your great effort,the project award was 719k ,as opposed to 1.29 mil. Just wanted to give you an update. Be well Brother Ron.
All the best”

I’m not asking you to believe a single word I say.  You must believe what I can PROVE.
Eight years of research, and I’m ready to go.  All USC has to say is “give it your best shot”, and I will accommodate you.  If you do not make the call, I’ll make it for you.

I’ve NEVER asked that Garland be removed from a bid list, but they be made to fairly “compete” against MAJOR mainstream manufacturers.  Please don’t give me bullet points of salesmen, as they are committed to memory.
I am concerned about “Measurable Units”, and not hypothesis.
Ron 

Thank you sir. I will email you some specifics. It does not have anything to do with Bluefin. It had to do with Garland cloning their RAMP program and having management level individuals within A/E firms implement he software. The A/E firms even pay for the program, which us genius really. MiRoof is the program I know is a clone. The "owner" Ryan Shultz works for Garland currently. Funny you mention Bluefin. He worked for them as well when it was RoofExpress. There are other clues to a connection there as well. We will probably connect some dots once we share our stories. I will follow this up with an email that includes more info. Have to run right now. Talk soon!

 *****This paper remains unfinished, and unedited.
I have a standing offer of $10,000.00 of my own money for Garland, or Tremco, if they agree to a televised public debate, and prove me wrong.  Money goes to a school of my choice.  8 years, no takers.
 
Tremco and their attorney are now being sued by the SEC.  The SEC is insisting on a jury trial, and it will not end well.  I thought I’d share that with you.

I can help you with RCI, and anything, you might need.

I do not have an “angle” so please don’t try to figure it out. 

You can also check out my friend Janet Campbell, an Architect in San Francisco. Her blog is “School Roofing Scam”   http://schoolroofingscam.blogspot.com/
Public Record is overwhelming, so nobody has to give a meaningless “Opinion”. This should keep you busy for a couple of centuries, but it also took a long time to create.

NOTE;  This paper remains generally unedited, and will glasdly accept constructive criticism.

Reject negativity in all forms, and always remember to keep looking "UP".

Respect.

Robert R. Solomon
Public Procurement Analyst
Florida Roofing Certification 
CCC 1325620

Sunday, January 14, 2018

Lewisburg School District continues to ignore the public. LETTER TO THE EDITOR. Max Bossert

Friends:

As distasteful as it was to report on a lying Florida Senator, the cases just keep on coming.  Why Ron?  Because it's a system rigged to favor one manufacturer, and increase commissions.

Why do they only want one manufacturer?  Because Purchasing Cooperatives are essentially "Commissioned Salesmen", and get 2%-4% of the contract amount.  They do not get paid to seek competitive pricing because that would mean less money for them.  Understood?  It's a SCAM., AND NOTHING MORE.

Type "School Roofing Scam" on YouTube, and you'll see what I mean.

U.S. Communities is one of the worst.  Lying about Garland being competitive is hilarious, once you know the facts.  Garland got their contract with U. S. Communities with 55 pages of BLANK DOCUMENTS.  What on earth did they compare $0.00 to?

Here is a very recent case of schools getting ripped off by the scheme.  "Predatory Sales Model" as I refer to them.   On average, these Purchasing Cooperative "sole source" contracts cost the taxpayer approximately 50% MORE than competitive, open, and fair, bidding scenarios.

Very special thanks to those who had enough, and did something about it.






http://www.dailyitem.com/opinion/we-the-people-are-being-robbed/article_dcf39cc8-0feb-501b-8fbd-8cce1295060c.html



LETTER TO THE EDITOR: We, The People are being robbed

By Max Bossert | Letter to the Editor

The Lewisburg School District continues to ignore the public.
A recent letter from Stacy Gasteiger (Dec. 22) about cronyism at the local level could not be more true.
The superintendent, the school board president, business manager will stop at nothing to be able to deal with the CSIU, KPN and Tremco of Ohio (who just used their other name of Weatherproofing Technologies) to mislead the voting public to get their project approved for the Linntown Elementary School roofing project.
To explain everything, the Lewisburg School District does not purchase anything from local business. The business manager has presented the roofing project four times since early spring. The original cost was $740,000. We requested they reconsider and they did stop the contract. Since then the price has fluctuated from $740,000 to $489,726 for the same project.
This is a project that could be done by any local tax paying contractor for less than $200,000.
I know this because we and other roofers are certified to do this type of work and we have been roofing since 1974 as well as roofing at the Linntown Elementary School some 30 years ago.
A copy of the bidding process required by the state was hand carried to the superintendent, the board president and business manager yet they continue to skirt the fair bidding practice set by the State of Pennsylvania and have awarded the contract to Waterproofing Technologies for $489,726.40. This cost, I believe, is $289,000 more than any other certified local roofer would charge for the same project if they had bothered to get more than one bid.
It certainly makes you wonder who is getting the extra $289,000.  
NOTE:  Tremco, and Garland Salesmen get paid 25% commission, where mainstream manufacturers pay salary.  That's a lot of money (the 25% Commission) that doesn't actually go into the job itself.
My personal opinion is that we need to get a new board president, new business manager and new local superintendent.
Remember citizens, it’s our responsibility to say something if you see something. I see people who are stealing money from our school district.
Please check out Tremco and Waterproofing Technologies at www.procurement-reform.org to see that we are not just blowing smoke.
Max Bossert,
West Milton
---------------------------------------
Very well done, and I am proud of those who stand up to the scam.  Those of us who scream for fairness, are typically at the hands of intellectual elitists who have no concept of modern roofing technique, material, or competitive bidding processes.  A complete fool can see how the "Roofing Scam" works.

They aren't spending their money, they're spending YOUR MONEY!  Republican, Democrat, and Independent, doesn't matter. They are supposed to be responsible stewards of our money, but instead, act as gravy sucking pigs at the trough.  Sorry to paint with such a broad brush, but the exceptions are few. 

Say NO to Purchasing Cooperatives, and the two vendors they prop up:  Tremco, and Garland.  
If you don't, you may find yourself in the news, and not the way you dreamed it.
Reject negativity in all forms, and always remember to keep looking "UP".

Constructive criticism is welcomed, and encouraged.
Respect.
Robert R. Solomon
Public Procurement Analyst
Florida Certification
CCC 1325620
Tampa, Florida




Thursday, January 4, 2018

Florida Senator, Keith Perry,. A man who chooses "Dishonor", over fairness to "Honorable" Veterans.


Friends:

Not long ago, I spoke to Florida Senator Keith Perry about "Predatory Sales Models", and exclusion of competition.  

Keith was under contract to install a Tremco roof on a VA facility, and was not genuine, real, or truthful with me.  Instead, he lied  to me, and went into hiding.  Typical of most politicians who chase the money, and could care less who they hurt.

Completely ashamed for the people he represents in District 8.  Keith is part of the problem, and the American people despise those who steal from Veterans.  He knows what he's doing as a Florida State Certified Roofing Contractor, and certified Tremco applicator.






It is heartbreaking when you're "Up Close" and dependent upon people to tell the truth.  Especially a public servant that's supposed to help us.

The good Senator brags about creating jobs, when he is actually practicing "Exclusion".




This is the original post, and outcome:

Honorable Florida Lawmaker To Help Stop "No Compete" Roofing in Public Works..

Friends:

A Florida State Senator called my home, and we spoke for almost an hour. 

The topic:  "Preferred Vendors", "Exclusion of Competition". "Line Item Bidding Scams", etc.  Regardless of the outcome, must respect the fact he was honorable enough to hear my concerns.  99% of public officials do not, and prefer to hide instead of work.

I am preparing a report for the Senator, and could use some help.  If anyone faces exclusion through a Purchasing Cooperative, Garland, Tremco, or Simon, please share it with me.  

I will get it to the Senator, and he's agreed to stop any project in which state funds were used without competition.  I don't want to be terribly specific at this time since it's been less than 48 hours since we spoke.

His word means nothing to me.  He asked that I send all email through his assistant, and after 9 unanswered email (data), never heard from him again.  I will forward all those emails to his Florida Senate account, and create a record of my communication.  That went a long way when the entire school board in Tuulsa refused to answer my inquiry three times.  That was their undoing..
Here, I will praise his work as an honorable politician if he lives up to his word.  I will go into this believing in him.  If he's not a man of his word, I'll report that too, and in great detail.   He did not keep his word, and I do not praise people who lie.  I gave him every opportunity to be the "Hero" but the lure of money was too great, so he chose the money, KNOWING the astonishing overcharges of Tremco products.  Tremco, the firm that was fined $61,000,000.00 by the DOJ, and is now being sued by the SEC for lying.  Type "Tremco DOJ" into the search box , and you will see how they operate.

Better yet, type 'School Roofing Scam" on YouTube, and you will see exactly how they work.  NOBODY in the private market would ever consider them.  They have the VA locked up, and somehow, I'm going to change that.

When I spoke to him, he said "The Guy" at the VA insisted on Tremco.  I told him "the Guy" at the VA has no authority to exclude competition in public works, and he doesn't.  This is what's wrong with government procurement, purchasing cooperatives, and roofers like Mr. Perry can't control their overactive salivary glands, and start slobbering over the money.

I said this was a VA facility.  A place of honor, and honorable people.  Do you think this thought ever crossed  Keith Perry's mind?  He's supposed to help taxpayers, but instead harms them.  I am ashamed that he chose to behave dishonorably.  As a Florida State Certified Roofing Contractor license holder myself, understand the philosophy of sales, but falling in with the "Roofing Scam", was a major disappointment.  MAJOR.

Even worse, he Chairs the "Ethics Committee" which I find hilarious.  Fox in the Hen House style.  I think the University of Florida should take a hard look at this guy before issuing more contracts to him.  Do business with him at your own peril.  I've warned you, and shared my personal experience.  All of it true, and there will be no forthcoming denial from him.  If he posts a comment on this site, I will be sure to post it for you to see.

I am in the "Fairness Business".
I may be on the cusp of success, and if I am, it's only because of my commitment to you.  I don't typically ask anyone for help, but if you'd like to contribute, you can do that with data.  Please share any school districts, or other public works in which only ONE manufacturer is listed, or accepted.

I suspect that will also apply to any Tremco, Garland, or Simon projects here in Florida, since they are the main culprits behind the "Predatory Sales Model", 

Needless to say, I am excessively grateful for your encouragement, and support.  Now, let's go get em'.  All information is held in strict confidence.

RobertRSolomon@aol.com

If you can see yourself clear to help me in my finest hour, I will protect you, and fight for you..  I do not turn down requests for help.
A Florida Senator, Keith Perry is a liar.  Period.  I do not appreciate his perpetuation of the stereotypical roofer image, as I fight to restore dignity to a noble discipline.

NOW, he'll get mad, take this personally, blame me, but I am not guilty of abusing Veterans.  He is.  The Tremco roof he installed is approximately 50% more than a competitively bid project, with major manufacturers.



                               

Some of you may know him as a nice person, and I think that's great.  I'm only reporting  MY experience, and exactly what happened.   Soon, I will post all 9 of those emails, including time stamp.  Everyone knows I back up every word I say. People like Keith Perry are responsible for perpetuating the scam, and I am ashamed that a grown man lied to me for absolutely no reason.  My Mother used to say: "He'd rather climb a tree and tell a lie, than stand on the ground and tell the truth".

I feel like an idiot for trusting this guy.

NOTE; Retired 2003, do not solicit nor accept compensation or personal advancement of any kind.

Reject negativity in all forms and always remember to keep looking "UP".

Much Respect.

Robert R. Solomon
Public Procurement Analyst
CCC 1325620
State Certified

Wednesday, November 8, 2017

Incredible school savings through competition.



Friends:

I've been involved in many school districts across the country, and this story is fairly representative of the savings.  If you are a school board member, FM Manager, Architect, Purchasing Director, etc., please do yourself a favor and read this through.  It is not the exception, but the rule.







Roofing is the costliest item of any school maintenance budget, and why a Purchasing Cooperative finds it lucrative. 

Much respect to Mr. Stephen J. Pytak for the wonderful article, and research.





MAR LIN — The Schuylkill County Area Vocational Technical School board on Monday 
hired a construction manager to replace the roofs at the Schuylkill Technology Centers
in Mar Lin and Frackville.

In a unanimous vote at the meeting at the Maple Avenue Campus, the STC board hired Performance Construction Services Inc., Pottsville, an affiliate of Quandel, Minersville,
for the job.

The total project cost should come to $1,710,000, about $800,000 less than anticipated, according to Brian A. Manning, business manager for STC and Schuylkill Intermediate
 Unit 29.

A few months ago, the board was planning to hire The Garland Co., a roofing 
manufacturer it had worked with numerous times, to do the project for $2.519 million, 
Manning said.

But in September, the board decided to consider other options.
“You may recall that I asked the board to create a roof committee to investigate
alternatives to the no-bid Garland deal. Well, my gut was right and the savings are 
estimated at $800,000,” a member of the board, David Frew of Pine Grove Area, said
 in an email to the newspaper Nov. 2.

In September, Frew suggested the STC board form a committee to research options. 
It included Frew and STC board members Jay Hanley of Mahanoy Area, Michael 
Holobetz of Saint Clair Area and Larry A. Wittig of Tamaqua Area.

Frew said a few firms were considered for the job.
At the meeting, the board entered into an agreement with Performance Construction
Services Inc. for the design-phase, the pre-construction phase and the construction
 phase of the roof replacement projects.

In its report to the board on “preliminary budget data,” Performance Construction 
estimated the replacement of the 65,000-square-foot roof at the North building in 
Frackville would cost $975,000, and the replacement of the 25,000-square-foot roof at 
the South building in Mar Lin would cost $375,000.

The soft costs should come to $360,000, according to the report.
They include: the architect, engineer, roofing consultant observation fees, $100,000; the construction management supervision fees, $150,000; the legal and print advertising
 and the bid document reproduction, $20,000; the building permits, $30,000; and a
4.5 percent construction contingency allowance, $60,000.

“The savings to the member school districts is expected to be almost $800,000. 
The Garland project was going to be done through a U.S. Communities deal and it 
wouldn’t have had to be bid in the literal sense of having to go out on the open market.
So their contract number was a not-to-exceed number,” Frew said at Monday’s meeting.

That was $2.519 million, Manning said.

“So they were both the manufacturer and the installer and the designer, and it was 
specified just for their product, they have a much better control on what the cost’s 
going to be. So it was expected that they would come in a few percentage points lower
than that,” Frew said.

“The deal with Quandel, or Performance Construction Services, is different. We hired them to represent us as our design professional. They put a budget number together and said, ‘this is what we reasonably expect the cost of the project to be’ based on all the parameters they’ve established,” Frew said.

“It is our understanding that the owner has obtained budget pricing for the roof
 replacement project under a state contract Master Intergovernmental Cooperative
 Purchasing Agreement arrangement that exceeds $2.5 million. The state contract
procurement, while convenient, may not offer the most competitive approach to this 
type of work. Our experience with other school districts is that better pricing can be 
obtained from the marketplace via competitive bids vs. the state contract. We have seen this with roof replacement projects, athletic field projects, fixture/furniture packages,
 Performance Construction said in its proposal to the board.

Performance Construction suggested the STC roofs be replaced with an EPDM synthetic rubber roofing membrane, “a rubber roof,” Frew said.

“Our objective is to provide a watertight roof on the buildings that has a 30-year 
warranty with a no-dollar limit. So if it fails in year 29, there’s no cost to the member 
districts,” Frew said.

The board anticipates the roof project will be complete sometime in summer 2018, he 
said. They agreed to have the roof substantially complete one week before the start of
 school,” Frew said.

Also present at Monday’s meeting were: Scott Jacoby of Schuylkill Haven Area, 
Hanley,

Gretchen Ulmer of Minersville Area, Mary Jo Moss of Blue Mountain, Charles “Chaz”
 Hepler of North Schuylkill, Helene Creasy of Shenandoah Valley and John Mika of 
Williams Valley.

Absent were: Scott Thomas of Pottsville Area, Holobetz, Roger Heidlebaugh of 
Tri-Valley and Larry A. Wittig of Tamaqua Area.

In other matters, the Schuylkill Intermediate Unit 29 Board of Directors also held its 
November meeting at the Maple Avenue Campus on Monday.
Contact the writer: spytak@republicanherald.com; 570-628-6011

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

U.S. Communities, and Garland use a "Predatory Sales Model", and I can easily refute their claims.  It is NEVER OKAY to get roofing quotes from only 1 manufacturer, and
 especially when a Purchasing Cooperative is involved.  The Purchasing Cooperative gets paid approximately 2%, and therefor have no incentive to seek fair pricing.  It's a scam, and nothing more.

I hope this information helps your schools.  That is the sole puurpose of this site.

Reject negativity in all forms, and always remember to keep looking 'UP".

NOTE: Retired 2003, I do not solicit nor accept compensation or personal advancement of any kind.
I am happy to hwlp anyone who needs me.

Respect.

Robert R. Solomon
Public Procurement Analyst
State Certified Roofing Contractor (retired)
CCC 1325620