Friday, December 28, 2012

"STOP PAVING OUR ROOFS !!!"


"STOP PAVING OUR ROOFS !!!"


Compilation and Comments by: Robert R. Solomon
(December 11, 2012)
Robert R. "Facts About Roofing Materi               als & The
Environmental (and fiscal) aspects of synthetic white roofing membrane, worker safety, harmful elements of petroleum based roofing, clean water, energy, and taxpayer VALUE. 
This paper is primarily intended for energy/water professionals and other environmental stewards.  The purpose of this presentation is to provide simple physics, scientific evidence, public record, published specifications, as well as illustrate “The Reality of Green Roofing”, and the copious amounts of oil being wasted on archaic and dangerous designs.
We will also touch upon “Public Procurement” methods.  It is absolutely CRITICAL that all Public Servants, FM Directors, Architects, Consultants, read this very important subject of how to provide inclusive and fair bidding for public money.  Private owners are free to do anything they wish with their own money. 
Personal Bio:
State certified roofing contractor CCC1325620 (37 years, retired in 2003), licensed consultant, and conservative environmentalist.  I’ve successfully completed hundreds of public and private projects.  Over the last eight years have participated in the Governor sponsored “Sustainable Florida” and “Sustainable Schools” initiatives as a judge.  “Responsible Conservation” is my theme, with a primary focus on the interface between roof system material, energy reduction, and clean water at a value to taxpayers. I offer my philosophy and research without prejudice.  Comments or observations throughout this presentation are borne by me alone. I am in hopes that I will clearly define my comments from those whom I give full credit and acknowledgement throughout.  Virtually all data is based upon scientific principle, public documents, and state laws. Placing value in your consideration, let us proceed with my observations and end with your conclusions.

Training:  Mr. Charlie Raymond, President NRCA, Mr. Joseph Rutkoski, President FRSA, and Mr. Robert W. Lyons, first and only two time President of RCI.

Clearly understanding the most important role of a roofing contractor is to install systems they are familiar with.  They are tasked with training, equipment, safety, and well being of those they employ and subsequently nourish.  I respect their commitment and cannot reasonably expect them to stand up for ideals, when they have mouths to feed.  I will attempt to do that for them here. 

STATEMENT:

ALL roof systems repel water by their respective design processes.  That is a given.  The purpose of this document is to illustrate how they may also be “Multidimensional” in affording great benefit to occupants of the structure.

Let’s begin with what I refer to as “Paving the Top of a Building” by evaluating the most common, inefficient, of all roofing materials: 

ASPHALT PETROLEUM ROOFING PRODUCTS:

Let us begin with some statistics regarding “Asphaltic Petroleum Roofing Products”.

The Asphalt Roofing Manufacturers Association (ARMA) is the largest petroleum based roofing organization in the United States, and this is their vision:  http://www.asphaltroofing.org/

Specifically:


 History of Asphalt Roofing

Since its discovery more than 5,000 years ago, asphalt has proved to be one of nature's most useful – and abundant – materials.
“Though you may never have considered it, asphalt (a petroleum byproduct), is a naturally occurring part of the environment. (And now thanks to advances in technology, asphalt roofing products are as friendly to the environment as they are to the buildings they protect.)”
No stranger to the building industry itself, asphalt has been used successfully as an excellent natural preservative, as well as an outstanding waterproofing and adhesive agent for centuries. For the past 150 years, in fact, asphalt has proved the most popular roofing material in North America. And deservedly so!


ARMA states:

How many homes are topped by asphalt shingles? Why?

“Asphalt shingles are the leading choice for residential roofing in the United States because they provide quality, durability, versatility and economy. Over 12.5 billion square feet of asphalt shingle products are manufactured annually – enough to cover more than 5 million homes every year. Four out of five homes are roofed with asphalt shingles.
Asphalt shingles offer consumers the broadest array of colors, shapes, and textures available. With an enormous range of styles, asphalt shingles can match almost every type of architectural design and achieve virtually any desired effect – and do it affordably”.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------

May I point out, not one square inch of the 12.5 BILLION sq. ft. produced annually, will ever break down in landfills.  I find it rather troubling that ARMA describes asphalt as “friendly to the environment.  It isn’t.

That 12.5 Billion sq. ft. each year, also translates to 11 Million Tons destined to our landfills.
------------------------------------------------------

Uses of petroleum asphalt:
Road construction
The largest use of petroleum asphalt is for making asphaltic concrete for road construction and accounts for approximately 80% of the petroleum asphalt consumed in the United States.
Roofing shingles
Roofing shingles account for most of the remaining 20% of asphalt consumption in the United States. Most of the petroleum asphalt used in manufacturing shingles is air-blown asphalt.
It is very important to learn the word, and definition of:  “Bitumen”.  Bitumen is synonymous with “Tar Sands”.
 http://ostseis.anl.gov/guide/tarsands/index.cfm

What Are Tar Sands?



            
Tar sands (also referred to as oil sands) are a combination of clay, sand, water, and bitumen, a heavy black viscous oil. 

Tar sands can be mined and processed to extract the oil-rich bitumen, which is then refined into oil. The bitumen in tar sands cannot be pumped from the ground in its natural state; instead tar sand deposits are mined, usually using strip mining or open pit techniques, or the oil is extracted by underground heating with additional upgrading.

Many are misled into thinking the Keystone Pipeline project with Canada is to pump oil.  Only a fraction of oil is extracted, with the rest going to low grade petroleum applications. 
A great deal of energy is consumed in either “strip mining”, or “steam injection” methods necessary to recover the “Tar Sands”, “Residuum”, or “Bitumen”.



Tar sands are mined and processed to generate oil similar to oil pumped from conventional oil wells, but extracting oil from tar sands is more complex than conventional oil recovery. Oil sands recovery processes include extraction and separation systems to separate the bitumen from the clay, sand, and water that make up the tar sands. Bitumen also requires additional upgrading before it can be refined. Because it is so viscous (thick), it also requires dilution with lighter hydrocarbons to make it transportable by pipelines.


Below, you will see the proportionate distribution in terms of refinery.  The portion at the very bottom is called “Residuum”, and that is the material used in asphalt shingles.




About two tons of tar sands are required to produce one barrel of oil. Roughly 75% of the bitumen can be recovered from sand. After oil extraction, the spent sand and other materials are then returned to the mine, which is eventually reclaimed.



Both mining and processing of tar sands involve a variety of environmental impacts, such as global warming and greenhouse gas emissions, disturbance of mined land; impacts on wildlife and air and water quality. 

The development of a commercial tar sands industry in the U.S. would also have significant social and economic impacts on local communities. 

Of special concern in the relatively arid Western United States is the large amount of water required for tar sands processing; currently, tar sands extraction and processing require several barrels of water for each barrel of oil produced, though some of the water can be recycled.
So, now we know a bit more about the materials used to make common asphalt roofing products, you may determine if ARMA’s statement: “Friendly to the environment” is valid.


Tar Sands Resources:

Much of the world's oil (more than 2 trillion barrels) is in the form of tar sands, although it is not all recoverable. While tar sands are found in many places worldwide, the largest deposits in the world are found in Canada (Alberta) and Venezuela, and much of the rest is found in various countries in the Middle East. In the United States, tar sands resources are primarily concentrated in Eastern Utah, mostly on public lands. The in-place tar sands oil resources in Utah are estimated at 12 to 19 billion barrels.


Later, we will discuss the use of a roofing system commonly referred to as “Modified Bitumen”.  Since I’m on “source” materials, and definitions, we will learn about the word “Bitumen”.

bi·tu·men

noun \bə-ˈtyü-mən, bī-, -ˈtü-, especially British also ˈbit-yə-\

Definition of BITUMEN

1: an asphalt of Asia Minor used in ancient times as a cement and mortar
2: any of various mixtures of hydrocarbons (as tar) often together with their nonmetallic derivatives that occur naturally or are obtained as residues after heat-refining natural substances (as petroleum); specifically : such a mixture soluble in carbon disulfide.
Bitumen/asphalt is a naturally occurring, highly flammable substance found in the Dead Sea area. In fact, Josephus refers to the Dead Sea as Lake Asphaltites. It is of interest to note that Josephus writes that the Lake Asphaltites was formed as a result of the devastation that destroyed Sodom and Gomorrah.
Please do follow along, as we will soon make a point.

Biblical references may include:


According to the book of Genesis:
Genesis 6:14   14 "Make for yourself an ark of gopher wood; you shall make the ark with rooms, and shall 1cover it inside and out with pitch.
The ark was painted inside and outside with pitch (tar), symbolizing renunciation (the exterior paint) and purity (the interior paint); by them, man is preserved by the Holy Spirit to glorify God.
And the book of Exodus:  Moses
Exodus 2:3   
But when she could hide him no longer, she got him a wicker basket and covered it over with tar and pitch. Then she put the child into it and set it among the reeds by the bank of the Nile.
We no longer live in Biblical times and have made great technological advancements since “tar” or “pitch” which is my point.

“PAVING your Roof”

A “Petroleum Based Roof” (shingles, modified bitumen) acts as a convection oven “Absorbing” the sun’s radiant energy instead of reflecting it.  Factually, these asphaltic systems may reach 200 degrees F. in hotter climates.  It is not unusual to experience a roof surface temperature increase of 90 degrees F. and beyond.
Why is this important?  It is important because it brings us to realize the phenomena: “Heat Island Effect”.
Recently, I had the great honor of speaking with Dr. Art Rosenfeld, former Director of Lawrence Berkley National Laboratories.

Dr. Rosenfeld has written a voluminous amount of study material illustrating the principle of “Reflectance” vs. “Radiant Absorption” far more than space allows here.  Please do read about him.  You will find his work as fascinating as I have.

Dr. Rosenfeld:




Regarding “White SYNTHETIC roof membranes”, Dr. Rosenfeld says:

“It keeps the city cooler, the Earth cooler and it saves energy,” Rosenfeld said, noting that roofs account for about a quarter of all surfaces in urban areas.

(Photo courtesy of Wal Mart)

Let us not complicate the simple principle of “Radiant Absorption” Vs. “Reflectivity”.  The Greeks have known this principle for many centuries:

Cool Surfaces.
We know that lighter colors keep us cool, since they reflect heat, while darker colors tend to keep us warmer, and so we wear lighter colored clothes in the summer than in the winter. Traditional cultures have exploited this phenomenon – think of the white-washed villages of the Greek islands, where every part of the village, from the walls, to the roofs, to the streets, are painted uniformly white to reflect the scorching rays of the summer sun.


Make sense?

The following statement is absolutely critical, and is the number ONE obstacle I face in getting this message out.  It’s when people see a white granular roof, they believe it is reflecting solar radiation, and that perception is 100% FALSE.  To substantiate this claim:


“The mineral particles typically used for making roofing granules, such as talc, slag, limestone, granite, syenite, diabase, greystone, slate, trap rock, basalt, greenstone, andesite, porphyry, rhyolite, and greystone, generally have low solar heat reflectance, that is, low reflectance of near infrared radiation. Further, the pigments employed for coloring roofing granules have usually been selected to provide shingles having an attractive appearance, with little thought to the thermal stresses encountered on shingled roofs. As a result, the colored roofing granules themselves typically have low solar heat reflectance”.

Read more:


http://www.faqs.org/patents/app/20100151199#ixzz0t7ksL8Kw


Are we clear on this?  Perhaps another illustration will put us over the top:

“The low solar reflectance can be attributed to several factors. First, there is a limited amount of pigment in the granule coating. Also, the roughness of the shingle contributes to multiple scattering of light and thus to increased absorption. Finally, the black asphalt substrate is not 100% covered, and reflects only about 5% of the light which strikes it”.



This is probably the only thing you need to actually remember:  Petroleum based (shingles, modified bitumen, built up) roofs get HOT.  White synthetics DO NOT GET HOT.
  
Absorption of Radiant Energy:
“Radiant energy that strikes a substance can be absorbed, transmitted, or reflected. The radiant energy that is absorbed by a substance is converted into heat or some other form of energy. The amount of energy absorbed depends on the physical nature of the substance and the character of the radiant energy. A mirror reflects most of the light that shines on it, while most of the light that strikes a non tinted glass window is transmitted through the window. Charcoal and soot, on the other hand, absorb virtually all light that strikes them.
The earth's atmosphere absorbs part of the energy radiated by the sun and thus prevents this energy from reaching the earth's surface. If this atmospheric absorption did not occur, life probably could not exist on earth. This is because the atmosphere absorbs ultraviolet rays, some of which are known to be lethal to both animals and plants. Light from distant stars is absorbed both by the atmosphere and by interstellar gas and dust”.
The color of an object that is not self-luminous is determined by the wavelengths of light that the object absorbs, transmits, and reflects.

White synthetic roof system SAVINGS vs. PV efficiency:
Solar collection devices are very intriguing, promising, and I believe the future of great energy independence.
At the moment, it is very inefficient, and costly, prohibiting widespread use.  I also believe when solar collection is commercially available at a reasonable price point (that is, without government subsidy), further research will skyrocket.  The private market and competition will (in my opinion) improve materials, efficiency ratings, and drastically lower costs.

FIRST, we must educate everyone regarding the “Truth” behind roofing systems, and materials.  Let us simply SAVE energy by reflecting radiant energy, and utilizing a principle that costs NO MONEY!
Am I getting the “Reflect Radiant Energy” point across yet?  There will still be a few charts and graphs left, but hopefully we will be 100% clear on this by documents end.
The “White” pigment contained in this system is Titanium Dioxide, and 1 of the top 50 materials produced worldwide.  I will discuss the fire retardant aspect later under “Clean Water”, as it is non toxic.

LEED AP’s and Builders:
White Synthetic Roofs are “GREEN”, and drastically reduce “Heat Island Effect"

 I’m going to go “Real World” on you for a moment, and illustrate the “Bottom Line” from an Owner’s perspective.
The “Private Owner” is far different from the “Public Owner”, as he, or she, is the one actually paying the energy bill with their money, not yours.  The statement by this owner is general, but on average15%-20% SAVED.  He shows how important it is to integrate roofing, HVAC, windows, paint, etc.
 
I will illustrate what that would mean to a “Public” structure, or perhaps a School District.  My School District pays an average of $40,000,000.00 per year in energy costs.  Imagine for a moment how 20% of that money SAVED ($8,000.000.00) could be better spent.

Next, you will see the Owner’s statement, and a very revealing energy model pertaining to schools using petroleum systems.

THE INSTALLED, AND LIFE CYCLE COST, IS LESS THAN A PETROLEUM ROOF!

This note is from the OWNER on a Firestone .060, over R20 Iso, and  20 year NDL warranty.

"Brandon has almost twice as much conditioned space as Tampa (64,229 sq. ft. vs 33,005 sq. ft., respectively) yet from the period of April through July of this year Brandon used 40% less electricity than Tampa; for a savings of $30,367 for the period.  I realize your TPO roof should get most of the credit but we should also consider the "cool-wall" paint on the exterior and the newer/more efficient equipment.  Thanks again for pushing the TPO roof.

Sincerely,
Cleve"

By using a synthetic system, we also saved 36,500 gals. of  petroleum. 

At this same time, by comparison, the Mayor of my city (Tampa, Florida) made front page news by saving 323 gallons in a 1 year period with her Toyota Camry Hybrid. 

Guess who made the front page and who didn't?

Please review the following energy model comparing a white granular modified bitumen roof system to a white TPO.  
The term of the roof warranty and model are a 30 year period, with modeling graciously provided by Carlisle Syntec.

RoofSense Life Cycle Savings Report

Project: Asphalt Built-up VS TPO
Scenario: TPO Savings
Heating and Cooling Data:
The heating and cooling load is referred to as the cost to heat and cool the facility. Following are the details of the buildings system efficiency, fuel type and associated cost used in the energy load calculation.
Cooling Data
Fuel Type: Electricity
System Efficiency: 8 S.E.E.R or E.E.R
Fuel Cost: $0.11 /Kwh
Fuel Inflation Rate: 5.68% per yr
Heating Data

Fuel Type: Electricity
System Efficiency: 65%
Fuel Cost: $0.11 /1000 CF
Fuel Inflation Rate: 5.68% per yr

Baseline Roof A:
Asphalt Built up

Roof Surface Type:
Off-White, Coated or Gravel

Existing Assembly Insulation R: 0
Insulation R to be Added: 20.5
Layer 1: 3.3 inches of Polyiso
Layer 2: n/a

Total Insulation R:  20.5
Proposed Roof B:
White TPO

Roof Surface Type:
TPO White

Existing Assembly Insulation R: 0
Insulation R to be Added: 20.5
Layer 1: 3.3 inches of Polyiso
Layer 2:  n/a

Total Insulation R:  20.5

 

Energy Cost Summary
Estimated Energy Cost:
The energy model within RoofSense compares the estimated energy cost of two roof systems over the term of analysis. Fuel cost and inflation, interior temperature, climate, roof surface type and color, and the amount of insulation utilized are included in the energy cost formulas. The following are estimated energy costs.

Baseline Roof A:
Asphalt Built up C1

Estimated Energy Cost:

Proposed Roof B:
White TPO

Estimated Energy Cost:
Cooling: $1,489,949.92

Cooling: $1,033,798.12
Heating: $612,110.95

Heating: $612,110.95
Total:
$2,102,060.87

Total:
$1,645,909.07





Energy Cost Reduction:  $456,151.80  ( 21.70% )

Environmental Emissions:

Environmental Emissions:
CO2 Carbon Dioxide
355377.8 LBS

CO2 Carbon Dioxide
278260.04 LBS
CH4 Methane
4.6 LBS

CH4 Methane
3.6 LBS
N2O Nitrous Oxide
3.84 LBS

N2O Nitrous Oxide
3 LBS





Carbon Reduction:  77117.76 LBS  ( 21.70% )

Energy Savings Notes:
The RoofSense energy savings model is based on the LC4 Life Cycle cost analysis tool developed by Pat Downey of Merik Professional Roofing Services in the late 1990’s.  The LC4 energy calculations and formulas are taken from the “1989 ASHRAE Fundamentals Handbook”.  Also used was the “Guide for Estimating Difference in Building Heating and Cooling Energy due to Change in Solar Reflectance of a Low-Slopped Roof”, Oak Ridge National Laboratory publication ORNL-6527 and the “NRCA Energy Manual” third edition, National Roofing Contractors Association, Chicago, IL. Adjustments to the formula and reflectance have been made as a result of a benchmarking study completed using Carrier’s “Hourly Analysis Program” (HAP) and ASHRAE’s standards on building simulation. Carrier’s HAP is approved by the government for studies done for the Tax Policy Act of 2005. Historic energy cost data, when used, has been obtained from the Energy Information Agency (EIA)


RESULT: 77,000 lbs. in carbon reduction, and $456,000.00 in energy savings over the term of roof warranty.  

I found this extraordinary, because the client was getting more than a singular dimension roof system.  Up front, and life cycle cost are outstanding.  This was a side by side energy model comparing white granular modified bitumen to white synthetic membrane.  Conditions and insulation were identical.

Wal-Mart is the largest private consumer of energy in North America, and they use it exclusively on all their stores, regardless of location.

http://news.walmart.com/media-library/photos/environment-sustainability/white-roof-skylights-las-vegas-walmart

 White roof and skylights on Las Vegas, Nev. Wal-Mart


Wal-Mart’s white roofs help reduce energy use and have a lower heat island effect than a darker roofing color. The skylights are part of the company’s daylight harvesting system, which can save an average of 800,000 kwh of energy annually.
2009July30: In order to improve energy efficiency, Wal-Mart stores built since 1999 in the US have white roofs. Dark roofs absorb as much as 90% of the sun’s heat, while a white roof can deflect approximately 85% to 90% of the sun’s heat (New York Times, 2009).

Prologis is the leading owner, operator and developer of industrial real estate, focused on global and regional markets across the Americas, Europe and Asia

http://www.prologis.com/en/corporate-responsibility/environmental-stewardship/sustainable-development/design-features.html



"High-reflectance roof membranes – Traditionally, warehouses have black EPDM rubber roofing membranes, which absorb heat from sunlight. White thermoplastic polyolefin (TPO) roofing offers the same performance at essentially the same cost while reducing urban heat island effect and often providing a more comfortable work environment."
I won’t continue driving this point with Target, Staples, etc., as you can see both the sustainability effort, and savings are staggering in scope.

 At this point, I think we’re clear on the energy savings, and value, but I will leave you once again with Dr. Art Rosenfeld:

"White roofs can cut a building's energy use by 20 percent and save consumers money," says California Energy Commissioner Art Rosenfeld. "The potential energy savings in the U.S. is in excess of $1 billion annually. Additionally, by conserving electricity we are emitting less CO2 from power plants," Rosenfeld added.

Together with Rosenfeld, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory scientists Hashem Akbari and Surabi Menon have quantified the effects of white roofs in populated settings in terms of how much carbon dioxide they offset.

Replacing non-reflective, dark roofing materials with white ones on an average house with 1,000 square feet of roof would result in an equivalent CO2 offset of 10 metric tons annually, the scientists estimate.

With an offset value of $25 per metric ton, that could be worth $250, according to European CO2 markets.
Their study is to be published in the scientific journal "Climatic Change."



In reality, I don’t expect many people to care about something they cannot see, but I do care about bringing the facts to you as a roofing professional and concerned citizen.  Now would be a good time to tell you I do not work for anyone, sell anything, buy anything, or promote specific manufacturers.

The topic of “Global Warming” is conspicuously absent in this writing.  

I am not a scientist, nor do I possess the credential necessary to address root mean cause.  But I am a roofer, and will confine the topic to only include things I know by way of research.  

The argument is actually not relevant regarding this subject matter, as I am discussing known, measurable values, and not speculation regarding man’s activity, or the earth’s cyclic warming/cooling patterns. 

This is common sense based upon a common scientific principle.

Reflecting the sun’s radiant energy away from a building is, to me, non-debatable.  If it’s not based upon science, or public record, you will not find it here.  I will leave the trafficking of opinions to others, as I must be able to prove what I say.

WATER:
Water is always associated with fire, so let us address fire retardant additives to Thermoplastic Polyolefin.

Magnesium carbonate, MgCO3, is a white solid that occurs in nature as a mineral. Several hydrated and basic forms of magnesium carbonate also exist as minerals. In addition, MgCO3 has a variety of uses.
MgCO3 is also used in flooring, fireproofing, fire extinguishing compositions, cosmetics, dusting powder, and toothpaste. Other applications are as filler material, smoke suppressant in plastics, a reinforcing agent in neoprene rubber, a drying agent, a laxative to loosen the bowels, and color retention in foods. In addition, high purity magnesium carbonate is used as antacid and as an additive in table salt to keep it free flowing.

MANY people worldwide depend upon their roofs as the only source of fresh water catchment.  A 1,000 sq. ft. roof will produce 600 gallons of fresh water in 1” downfall. 
NO ROOF IS IMMUNE TO JET FUEL EXHAUST, OR AIRBORNE FUNGAL SPORES.  In some areas, there is a vermin problem as well, but we can hope to REDUCE contamination.  Single ply roofs clean easily with “Simple Green”, a garden hose, and push broom.
Roof systems that are favorable to water collection are prefinished metal roofs, clay and concrete tiles, and white synthetic TPO.
Many people ask me if asphalt shingle (petroleum) roofs are suitable for water collection.  I do not feel qualified to provide a definitive answer on this.  Instead, I will share published comments by the world’s largest manufacturer of asphalt shingles, GAF.
Before we see comments, graciously, and honestly provided by GAF, I have a comment.  GAF is one of the most honorable, and reliable manufacturers of residential, and commercial roof systems on the planet.  This is why I choose them as the reference standard on this topic.
You may wish to visit them:  http://www.gaf.com/
The following literature should be considered the industry standard, and I admire them for having the courage to publish it honestly.
Most blame lawn fertilizer, and livestock for the bulk of storm water contamination.  Factually, a great deal of contamination is in the form of phosphorous, and nitrogen, leaching from petroleum roofs.  Of course this starves our water bodies of oxygen, and subsequently inhibits microbial growth.  This sequence prevails itself upward in the food chain, and it’s something we should think about.  It does not have to be this way if we simply “STOP Paving Our Roofs”.
Again, thank you to GAF, an Honorable Manufacturer with excellent roofing products:

SUBJECT:
Reclaimed Water from an Asphalt Shingle Roof

Can I Reclaim Water (Collect Water For Use) Run-off From My Roof?

Yes… But you should only use this water for lawn, shrubbery, and flower irrigation since
water run-off from asphalt shingles is not FDA approved for potable water reclamation
or agricultural use.

What this means…is that because it is not FDA approved, the reclaimed water is not
suitable for:

drinking
cooking
bathing
watering of fruits or vegetables for human consumption

What Should I Know?

Water reclaimed from a shingle roof… may present a variety of hazards that may affect
you or your animal’s health.  While the water may seem “clean”, consider:

Asphalt is processed from crude oil and there are chemicals in asphalt that can be
hazardous to your health if consumed.

The granule surface can collect dirt and other air pollutants which vary by
location… water running over these granules can collect the dirt and pollutants as it runs
off the roof.

Under the correct conditions, algae, mold, moss, and mildew can grow on the
shingle surface. These fungi may be harmful to people and animals when introduced into
a drinking water supply.

Shingles may contain copper oxide, or other algae inhibitors that may harm
aquatic life
.
Where Can I Get More Information?

GAF-Elk Technical Services can assist you… with these and other questions you may
have regarding your new roof installation. GAF-Elk Technical Services can be contacted:

800-ROOF-411 (800-766-3411). Also, the GAF-Elk website is a great resource for just about any question you may have, or for additional information you may require.
That site is at: www.gaf.com

Hopefully, that will bring the topic into focus, as the definitive authority (GAF) has spoken.  Now imagine asphalt roofing for the millions whose lives depend upon rain water catchment from their roof alone.


An excellent discussion regarding conservation of fresh water is brought to us by the good people at National Geographic:

Less than 1 percent of Earth's water is drinkable. In America, water is relatively plentiful, and a typical household uses approximately 260 gallons of water every single day. Tap water has to be processed, which takes energy and costs money. The more water that is used, the more it costs environmentally and financially”.



Collecting water from petroleum based roofs is not unlike collecting water from an asphalt paved road.  Those little “rainbows” we see in puddles after the rainstorm are not our friends.

The Chief Geologist of an International Civil Engineering Firm told me that so much bacteria is “washed out” in a rainstorm that children should not be allowed to play outside until 2 hours afterward.

Perhaps if we consider fresh water our most valuable commodity, we will make informed decisions regarding its preservation.

In addition to sharing the environmental impact petroleum based roofing has, I am also trying to offer value laden options to it.  So far, we’ve talked about huge energy savings, and clean water.
 
WORKER SAFETY: 
The number one cause of all roofing injury claims is “Soft Tissue Damage”.  This is not surprising, as they are routinely lifting over 250 lbs. per 100 sq. ft. of asphalt shingles, or lifting 100 lb. rolls of modified bitumen, and 100 lb. cartons of asphalt all day.  We amplify an EXTREME environment for them by introducing 450 degree F. molten asphalt to the equation.  Or, propane torches in the case of modified bitumen.

In a DOE video, Dr. Steven Chu says:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q0GKcdgxHsk

Why the industry urgency to move toward the use of materials such as TPO? Because white roof membranes help reduce both energy requirements and costs for cooling - a reason that sits well with building owners as well. And according to Patrick Downey, CSI, RRC, president of Atlanta's Merik Inc., a roof consulting firm that specializes in energy efficiency, "White and light roof studies throughout the Sunbelt have demonstrated that the savings in hot/warm weather cooling costs more than offset the slight increase in cold/cool weather heating costs."
In contrast, the dark, heat-absorbing roofing of days gone by is associated with a condition known as the "urban heat island" effect and is also linked with hazardous ozone levels. Both of these conditions, coupled with a reduction in natural shading, contribute to a considerable increase in metropolitan area temperatures and, hence, higher energy bills.
To facilitate the move toward mandating white roofing, components of regulations such as the ASHRAE 90.1 Energy Efficient Standards indicate that  

white roof membranes can now be used in place of additional 

insulation to reduce cooling energy consumption in some instances. 

I ABSOLUTELY DISASGREE WITH WHOMEVER TOLD THIS TO DR.
CHU.
NEVER CHEAPEN A ROOF WITH LESS INSULATION.  THE SAVINGS
 ARE MINIMAL COMPARED TO THE BENEFIT.

Similarly, in the state of Georgia, precedent-setting white roofing legislation known as the Georgia White Roof Amendment was passed to enforce the same standards. On a national scale, the U.S. Department of Energy and the Environmental Protection Agency are now funding efforts to encourage the use of white roofing.
While the white TPO material can help save on building cooling costs, this benefit is just one of the many environmentally sound attributes of the single-ply roofing membrane. From initial raw materials manufacturing to disposal at the end of the system's useful life, TPO offers product features that pose less of an adverse impact on the general environment than other popular single-ply roofing materials.

Following is a quick look at why TPO is an environmentally sound,

front-row leader in the move toward white and light-colored

* TPO's raw materials are created in sealed reactors without production of hazardous by-products.
* TPO's manufacturing process ensures that scraps or reject materials are immediately recycled into the product stream.
* TPO is hot-air welded; therefore, no smoke or strong fumes are produced during application.
* Unlike PVC, TPO contains no migratory plasticizers that leak 

into the air and/or storm-water runoff.
In addition to its environmental desirability, TPO provides the weather ability of an EPDM and the superior seam strength of PVC - translating into savings in maintenance and repair. The result: more green all the way around.
Explanations are courtesy of the National Roofing Contractors Association and Duro-Last Roofing Inc., Saginaw, Mich.

Metal Roof systems:

Metal roof systems (along with clay tile) are probably the most aesthetically pleasing of all roof systems.  They come in a variety of base materials (copper, steel or aluminum), and have an outrageous range in terms of color palette selections.
There are just too many styles and applications for me to properly address here, but we’ll take a look at some beautiful examples.


The “Life Cycle Cost” is superior to any brand, make, or series of asphalt shingles.  These roofs require a higher level of competency in installation, and flashing details are critical.

The “Color” you see is a bonding resin technique commonly referred to as “Kynar 500”.
It’s best if I let them describe the process here:  

http://www.kynar500.com/

For those of you involved with large commercial structures, you will be doing yourself a disservice by going “cheap” with painted galvanized flashings.  ESPECIALLY drip edges, gutter, downspouts, copings, because they WILL RUST PREMATURELY.  The Kynar 500 type coatings (available by all metal panel manufacturers as the industry standard) come with a free (typically) 20 year “Finish Warranty”. 

Fact is, the roof will almost certainly last beyond your lifetime, and it will be your last roofing adventure.
Metal roofs are recyclable, and they do not contaminate storm water. 
Many colors and pigment technologies far surpass the .29 reflection requirement of LEED.  This is critical because you (dependent upon color) will meet energy rebate requirements.
This is an excerpt from PG&E’s cool roof rebate program:

http://www.pge.com/myhome/saveenergymoney/rebates/remodeling/coolroof/

 PG&E's 2010-2012 rebate program is available for qualifying products purchased and installed between January 1, 2010 and December 31, 2012. Payment of rebates is not guaranteed as funds are limited, and amounts and offerings are subject to change. All rebate program terms and conditions apply.

Type
Aged Solar Reflectance
Aged Thermal Emittance
Rebate Amt
Low Slope
(excluding CZ 13)
≥ 0.55
≥ 0.75
$0.20/sq. ft.
≥ 0.35
≥ 0.75
$0.20/sq. ft.
≥ 0.25
≥ 0.75
$0.10/sq. ft.
For a complete list of qualifying products, visit www.coolroofs.org
The roof rebate program is probably the most effective energy incentive I’ve been able to find.  This roof will continue to reduce your energy demand for many years.  The same thing is true of attic insulation, or insulation of any kind.
We want to first reflect the sun’s radiant energy at the roof surface, and whatever thermal stress that passes will be effectively blocked by a minimum “R” = 20.0.  A thermal coefficient of “R” = 30.0 is far preferred, and the cost is pretty insignificant.

In my case, the rebate included sealing of duct work, and an additional “R” = 11.0 blown fiberglass into my attic, as I already had “R” = 20.0.  My home is 2,500 sq. ft. and the total out of pocket cost was $150.00 to me.  My energy bill has been $100.00 per month LESS on a very regular basis.  So, after 6 weeks, my $150.00 had been returned to me in the form of savings.
 
I cannot emphasize the value of passive methods like attic insulation and reflectivity enough.  By far, the best investment you can make to your home, your wallet, and your comfort.

“Emissivity”

Definition of EMISSIVITY

: the relative power of a surface to emit heat by radiation : the ratio of the radiant energy emitted by a surface to that emitted by a blackbody at the same temperature
Rather than bludgeon you with copious data here, it is essentially the ability of something to release the energy it has absorbed.

Petroleum based roof systems absorb a great deal of energy, and retain it well into the evening.  Metals, synthetics, and most tiles do not.  Below, you qill find the most comprehensive body of work that exists on the topic.  The “Heat Island Group” at Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratories has no equal.

http://heatisland.lbl.gov/
 
This roofing primer is general of course, and hopefully touched upon an area of interest for you. 

Since the document is also for those in public service, purchasing, and procurement, I am especially interested in law governing what we can and can’t do.  

Remember, the government is not an “owner” in the traditional sense.  Taxpayers are in fact the “owners” of all public structures.

For the time being, I will leave you to ponder "Tar Sands", and why people feel the need to put petroleum on the TOP of buildings.

Reject negativity in all forms, and always remember to keep looking "UP".

Respectfully,

Robert R.Solomon
CCC1325620 (Florida State Certification)
Public Procurement Analyst
Licensed Roofing Consultant

 







Saturday, November 17, 2012

Garland, U.S. Communities, and YOU!

This is from public record, and readily available.  I will respectfully request anyone to offer comments correcting me (referenced) on anything you feel I am factually incorrect.  I will amend my comments ONLY if proven wrong through record.
When that happens, I will reveal the U.S. Communities "Bid" results used to facilitate this behavior in my next post.

NOTE: I am independent of influence. Retired (2003), do not work for anyone, do not solicit, nor accept compensation or personal advancement of any kind, from anyone for anything I do. My writings are intended for public consumption, and free to distribute as you wish.

This will also be a lesson (textbook) on how ONE roofing material manufacturer (Garland), and ONE "Purchasing Agency", spend YOUR tax dollars.

Every state in the Republic has public procurement laws in place to insure "Competitive Bidding".

Today's lesson will show you specifically how "Purchasing Agencies" eliminate all that, and how it's manufactured for their benefit.  I'm going to be very specific, and offer only data that is public record.

Before we begin, please let me thank the good men and women of Roof Consultant's Institute, the reference standard within our industry for their official position AGAINST such deception.

http://www.nrca.net/rp/news/stories/rci-announces-position-on-procurement.7-2-2012.2795.aspx

RCI, Inc. Position Statement on Procurement – Support Document

June 21, 2012RCI’s Position Statement applies to all publicly bid work, including federal, state (provincial/ territorial), municipal, and local government projects or otherwise taxpayer-funded projects in which RCI, Inc. members may participate. Projects not under the procurement requirements of government agencies or that do not utilize taxpayer funds should also employ similar fair and impartial procurement practices.

It is the position of RCI, Inc. that all public work and taxpayer-funded projects clearly adhere to all applicable procurement regulations, maintain the highest levels of transparency and value, and comply with the following principles.

In addition to the owner, projects should involve three distinct entities: the design professional, the manufacturer (or supplier), and the qualified contractor (contractor).

1. The design professional should be selected by the owner based on qualifications, experience and past performance. The design professional should prepare contract documents to be in compliance with all applicable code requirements (including but not limited to fire, wind, drainage, thermal resistance or performance, warranty and environmental requirements).

Contract documents should not be proprietary or exclusive to a manufacturer, a supplier or a qualified contractor. A product or system that may be able to be produced, supplied or installed by other competitors but is not, is considered a proprietary product/system. Procurement regulations have specific procedures that are required if proprietary materials or systems are to be considered.

Design professionals are discouraged from utilizing proprietary specifications. All projects should utilize a minimum of three manufacturers or utilize materials commonly available from three manufacturers. Systems should be selected to meet specific performance criteria or standards.

The design professional must adhere to all state (provincial/territorial) licensing requirements and carry the appropriate errors and omissions insurance.

2. The manufacturer and its suppliers should provide the materials and systems adhering to the contract documents. A manufacturer should not act as the design professional unless qualified to do so, and should state in writing and publicly its financial interest in the specifications/requirements provided.

Contractual obligations or agreements should not exist between owners and manufacturers. Proprietary and/or exclusionary specifications intended to limit competition among manufacturers, suppliers and/or qualified contractors are strongly discouraged. Manufacturers are encouraged to provide data.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

I think it's pretty clear that "ELIMINATING COMPETITION" is a bad idea, and wildly inappropriate.  This lesson will show how a state (Georgia) enlists the "Purchasing Agency" to eliminate all that "Competitive Bid" stuff for us, and eliminate anything that may resemble "Value" for the taxpayer (YOU).  Keep in mind this is only ONE example of a condition that exists throughout N. America.

1.)  Enlist the "Purchasing Agency" to "buy in bulk", and to "save money".

2.)  Identify a "Preferred Vendor".  In this case "Garland".

3.)  Issue a bid notice eliminating competition by practicing "Exclusion".

The manufacturer has this sewn up, and there is absolutely no incentive for them to compete.  Of course they have several "Approved Applicators" who know how the game is played.

 Here is a pretty standard example:

GARLAND MATERIAL LIST
It
is the intent of the Dekalb County Schools ("Agency") to purchase materials for the Dekalb Middle
School ("Project") located on 1132 West Broad Street directly from Garland
/DBS, Inc., based upon the Agency's participation in the U.S. Communities ™ Government Purchasing Alliance's program for
Roofing Supplies and Related Products and Services,
as priced by and awarded to Garland/DBS, Inc.,
resulting from the competitively solicited Sealed Bid
# 09-5408 issued by the Cobb County Board of
Commissioners.
As a
bidder on the Project, you are required to fill in your order quantities for the following materials as
listed below:
Product# Product N arne Unit
I
Size Coverage Rate Quantity
4363-60 Versiply
60 1 square (34'8"x 3'-3"
4121 HPR Tri-Base Premium
2 square (72'x3')
4369
Versiply Mineral .75 square (26'-2." X 3'-3")
7425-5
Silver-Flash 5 Gallon (1 Gal/ 7 1ft)

How can a public project be so blatantly abusive to the taxpayers?  "Competitively Solicited?  We are illustrating Garland in this case, but other manufacturer's like Tremco, are widely known throughout the industry, and all you have to do is check out "School Roofing Scams" on YouTube.

 There will be no shortage of investigative reports by news outlets.  NOTHING I say matters, and it's entirely up to you to compare and confirm (or deny)to your own satisfaction.  If you believe your tax dollars should be spent without competition, that's fine by me.  It would be very difficult to support that line of reason however.

Forgive me for shifting gears, but I get tired of such negative scenarios it is my promise to tell you the truth.  Unfortunately, the truth can be very ugly at times.

Let's close with something upbeat and positive though.

Involved with the "Sustainable Florida", and "Sustainable Schools" initiatives, and serving 8 judgeships, I meet some very nice peiople along the way.

This is a photo of world famous wildlife photographer, Mr. Clyde Butcher and I.  Check out his work, and his Everglades photography is magnificent because he shoots virtually everything in large format.




                                    http://www.clydebutcher.com/ 


Do not adjust your settings, as my head must be viewed in 16:9 ratio to fit your screen.  What a joy it was to meet, and speak with this genius, and amazing photographer.

I don't want to be secretive with you, but I really do prefer uplifting, positive, and fun things over conflict and strife.

Please confirm my words, and you are the judge.

I am honored with each and every visit you make to this space, and only hope I am serving a need for you.

Reject negativity in all forms, and always remember to keep looking "UP".

Respect,

Robert R. "Ron" Solomon
Manager, Roof Consultant's Alliance (2,100 members)
CCC1325620
RobertRSolomon@aol.com


NOTE: I am independent of influence. Retired (2003), do not work for anyone, do not solicit, nor accept compensation or personal advancement of any kind, from anyone for anything I do. My writings are intended for public consumption, and free to distribute as you wish.

Monday, October 29, 2012

"Collecting Water From Asphalt Shingle Roofs"

I thought the best source of information was from the largest roofing materials manufacturer in the world.  They also produce the best selling "Timberline" series.

Before I share data from GAF, let me describe GAF to you from personal experience:  They are an honest manufacturer, fight fair, and have an extremely comprehensive line of roofing products.  I must praise them for telling you the TRUTH, and not trying to eke out one more sale through decption.

By now, you know I hold GAF, Firestone, Carlisle-Syntec in the very highest regard.  So let's answer your question:

SUBJECT: Reclaimed Water From An Asphalt Shingle Roof

Can I Reclaim Water (Collect Water For Use) Run-off From My Roof?

Yes… But you should only use this water for lawn, shrubbery, and flower irrigation since water run-off from asphalt shingles is not FDA approved for potable water reclamation or agricultural use.

What this means…is that because it is not FDA approved, the reclaimed water is not suitable for:
• drinking
• cooking
• bathing
• watering of fruits or vegetables for human consumption

What Should I Know?

Water reclaimed from a shingle roof… may present a variety of hazards that may affect you or your animal’s health. While the water may seem “clean”, consider:

• Asphalt is processed from crude oil and there are chemicals in asphalt that can be hazardous to your health if consumed.

• The granule surface can collect dirt and other air pollutants which vary by location… water running over these granules can collect the dirt and pollutants as it runs off the roof.

• Under the correct conditions, algae, mold, moss, and mildew can grow on the shingle surface. These fungi may be harmful to people and animals when introduced into a drinking water supply.

• Shingles may contain copper oxide, or other algae inhibitors that may harm aquatic life.

                               Where Can I Get More Information?

GAF-Elk Technical Services can assist you… with these and other questions you may have regarding your new roof installation. GAF-Elk Technical Services can be contacted at 800-ROOF-411 (800-766-3411). Also, the GAF-Elk website is a great resource for just about any question you may have or for additional information you may require. That site is at: www.gaf.com

So, now you've heard it from the "TOP", and don't have to depend upon hearsay.

You know those little "Rainbows" that form on asphalt pavement in puddles after a rainstorm?  They are not your friends.

The same principle applies to petroleum on the TOP of a structure, just like it does on the street.

Make sense?

I am researching the possibility of presenting an actual recording of my presentations here, as it may provide a more personal aspect to what we're trying to do.  If that's something you'd like to see and hear, please do let me know.

Thank you for spending time with me today.  I feel strong, mentally where I want to be, and most of all: HAPPY.

Respect each other.  Help each other. Encourage each other.

We will all be better for it.

I will encourage each of you to reject negativity in all forms, and remember to always keep looking "UP".

Respect,

Robert R. "Ron" Solomon
Manager, Roof Consultant's Alliance
CCC1325620 State Cert.
RobertRSolomon@aol.com

Sunday, September 9, 2012

"BURNIN' DOWN THE HOUSE" (or School)

I tell people all the time that with today's modern roofing materials, and techniques, there should be no reason to expose workmen (and structures) to open flame or molten asphalt.

Yet another building (school) burned down using outdated methods.  This particular one is approximately 20 miles from my home, and have visited there many times.  A crying shame.

Video:  http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=baUSnP8SHPM&feature=relmfu







Tampa Bay Times, By: Laura C. Morel, and Cara Fitzpatrick

Times Staff Writers, In Print: Saturday, September 1, 2012.

 ST. PETERSBURG — For drama students at St. Petersburg High, the school's auditorium is much more than a stage.

Seniors keep their lockers there. Students sit in circles on the stage and chat over lunch. They mingle there before and after class.  "It sounds really trite to say," said Whitney Essman, a senior and a member of the Thespian group, "but it's like a home for us."

That home sustained significant damage early Friday when a fire tore through part of the roof and tech booth, causing more than $1 million in water and smoke damage.

About midnight Friday, firefighters received a call about flames showing from the school's roof. They arrived and found a group of workers with a blow torch. About 3:30 a.m., the workers left.

Thirty minutes later, the fire alarm went off. When fire crews arrived, flames were shooting through the roof of the school's historic three-story auditorium. They called for reinforcements and cut off power to the school, said St. Petersburg Fire Rescue spokesman Lt. Joel Granata.

Two hours later, the blaze was extinguished. But the damage was done.

The tech booth that controls the sound and lighting system was destroyed. Water and smoke damage covered the auditorium. A gaping hole opened in the ceiling. Classes on Friday were canceled for more than 2,300 students.

"I was just, like, stunned," Essman, 17, said. "When a school catches fire you think of, like, the science lab. I didn't think it would be in, like, this place that is so important to me. Then I just started fearing the worst."

The cause of the fire is under investigation, but Granata said investigators think the roofing work contributed to the start of the blaze.

Fort Lauderdale-based Taylor Contracting and Roofing Inc. was hired by Pinellas schools more than three weeks ago to install a roof replacement. After numerous requests for comment Friday, the company issued a statement saying it was "in full cooperation" with the school district to get to the source of what went wrong.

School district officials met Friday to discuss the damage, the repair plan and how to pay for it, said spokeswoman Melanie Marquez. It was too soon to know if the district or the company's insurance would cover the damage.

The district still needs reports from its risk management and fire departments, she said.

"I know there's going to be a lot of work going on," Marquez said.
School principal Al Bennett received calls and emails Friday from students, teachers and alumni.

St. Petersburg High opened in 1898 and had its first graduating class in 1901, according to its website. Its current building at 2501 Fifth Ave. N was listed in the National Register of Historic Places in 1984.

"They all want to help," he said. "I know we can fix it. It's just disruptive."
Bennett said the auditorium may reopen by November, when the Thespians have planned to hold their first play of the year, The Curious Savage. Most of the repairs, including replacing the carpet and cleaning up debris, should be completed by then.

"The show should go on," said Trish Grunz, drama director. "I was happy not everything was affected."

Among the items spared by the fire: props, costumes and the stage.
But until November, the Thespians will need another place to rehearse. The group has a theater conference in October.

About 20 of the 60 or so Thespians met at Crescent Lake Park after the fire. They sang songs from old shows and "bonded for a while," said Luisa Laitano, 17, the group's president.

Classes were expected to resume Tuesday. About 20 maintenance workers will begin the auditorium cleanup and temporarily fix the roof to prevent any leaks this weekend, Marquez said.

"These things do happen," said principal Bennett. "And we just have to persevere and move forward."

Staff writer Marissa Lang and Times researchers Carolyn Edds and Natalie A. Watson contributed to this report. Laura C. Morel can be reached at (727) 893-8713 or lmorel@tampabay.com.
[Last modified: Aug 31, 2012 10:40 PM]

Copyright 2012 Tampa Bay Times

Many examples of this exist.  My hope is that one day we can understand applying petroleum roofs with FIRE, is a bad idea.

This is what the workmen see all day long, and you wonder how the building catches on fire:








In essence, "PAVING" a roof in asphalt.  These roofs DO REPEL WATER, but all roofs do that by their respective design processes.  This particular roof system can reach roof surface temperatures of 200 degrees F. (creating a 20% energy demand), and will never break down in landfills. 

To this moment, I cannot find a RATIONAL explanation of it's use.  I almost forgot:  The TAXPAYERS are paying a PREMIUM without the slightest realized BENEFIT for that expenditure.

Dear friends, I would rather spend my time showing you the POSITIVES of roofing (and there are some), than harping on primitive oil based (bitumen) roofs, and wasting money.

Unfortunately, these scenarios are almost always in public works, even though the DOE preaches against it. Do as I say, not as I do" seems to be the theme.

Lately however, I am meeting interesting people who (I believe) are serious about making a difference, and reversing this trend.  GOOD people whom I appreciate.

As always, I am thankful for the time you graciously invest reading what I have to say, and am humbled you spend your valuable time with me here.

Reject negativity in all forms, and remember to always keep looking "UP".

Respect,

Robert R. "Ron" Solomon
Procurement Analyst - Division 7
Manager Roof Consultant's Alliance
CCC1325620 State Certification




Saturday, August 11, 2012

"Courage, and Carlisle-Syntec's stand against Co-Op Purchasing"

Anyone who's read a single word here, knows how much I despise "No Compete", "Proprietary Specifications", and "Sole Source" arrangements in Public Works.

They serve no purpose except to cheat you (the taxpayer) out of billions of dollars.  They do this through "Cozy" arrangements with Purchasing Agencies that eliminate, or severely restrict competition to favor only one material manufacturer.

In other words, there is absolutely no incentive to compete for your hard earned taxpayer dollars.

There are only a handful of people in North America who fight hard against "The Machine" for you. 

Often wondering why major roofing material manufacturers do not stand up to blatant abuse of the law, I'd now like to use Carlisle-Syntec as an example of how it CAN BE DONE! I finally see someone with the courage and spine to fight.  And, WIN!

In previous posts here, I've described GAF, Firestone, and Carlisle-Syntec as HONEST roofing material manufacturers.  Today I would like to congratulate, and acknowledge, Carlisle-Syntec's stand against taxpayer abuse.  I happen to know the people at Carlisle-Syntec to be honorable.



Please see source, and full content here (highlighted areas are by me):

http://cumberlink.com/news/local/crime-and-courts/cv-school-district-settles-lawsuit-with-carlisle-syntec-systems-employees/article_4e09a08c-9e18-11e1-9085-001a4bcf887a.html

CV school district settles lawsuit with Carlisle SynTec Systems employees:

Cumberland Valley School District recently settled a lawsuit in which it agreed to stop using cooperative purchasing programs for roofing projects.

Nicholas Shears and Michael DuCharme, both employees of Carlisle SynTec Systems, filed the lawsuit in June 2009, which contends the district’s use of a purchasing cooperative skirts state competitive bidding laws, resulting in higher costs for taxpayers.

While the district admits no wrongdoing, it has agreed to comply with state competitive bidding laws and cease the use of purchasing cooperatives, SynTec spokesman Brandon Peach said in a press release issued Monday.

"We’re glad the school district understands it can save taxpayer money by competitively bidding projects requiring roof work to ensure that the most qualified option is selected," said DuCharme, director of product marketing for the company.

"Unfortunately, the well-intended cooperative purchasing method has resulted in inflated costs due to the inherent complexity of construction work," DuCharme added.

Still bid co-op
While the district has agreed to cease the use of co-op programs for roofing projects, it reserves the right to use competitively bid co-op programs for many of its other business functions, district spokeswoman Tracy Panzer said.

"The district continues to maintain the contract in question was awarded through a competitively-bid cooperative purchasing program administered by the Central Susquehanna Intermediate Unit (CSIU), which is permitted by the Commonwealth Procurement Code," Panzer said.

The Cumberland Valley School Board in February 2009 awarded a $1.5 million contract to Tremco/Weatherproofing Technologies Incorporated for repair work at Monroe and Silver Spring elementary schools and at the Eagle View Middle School.

The lawsuit challenged the board’s authority to choose Tremco through a co-op agreement run by the Association of Educational Purchasing Agencies, which consists of educational consortiums from across the country.

In February 2009, SynTec spokesman Tony Matter said the company was not seeking a monetary award from the suit, but was instead seeking a ruling from the courts that the district was incorrect in using such a program.

Matter added SynTec brought the suit not because it was displeased the repair work went to another contractor, but because of its belief that use of the program undermines the spirit of the state law that requires competitive bidding.

Debating the costs
In May 2009, DuCharme said his company could have done the repair work for far less than Tremco, especially because the roof at Eagle View was still under warranty at that time as a Carlisle SynTec product.
The cooperative purchasing program allows school districts the option to use recommendations by a third party. In this case, CSIU receives quotes from a wide array of contractors, both in-state and out-of-state, through the AEPA and selects one as a default for work done in that area of expertise.

In its press release Monday, SynTec mentioned how cooperative purchasing methods have come under fire across the country for subverting the competitive bidding process.

"Independent surveys have demonstrated that roofing work procured through a cooperative can cost two to three times the average market value," Peach said. "While the competitive bidding model requires a design professional to approve any structural alterations, cooperatives often do not, resulting in a dangerous lack of construction oversight."

Peach added legislation has been implemented in Virginia and California to prevent such practices, with ongoing policy discussions taking place in Pennsylvania, Maryland, Virginia, Indiana, Texas and California.

Posted earlier on Cumberlink:
Cumberland Valley School District recently settled a lawsuit in which it agreed to stop using cooperative purchasing programs for roofing projects.

Nicholas Shears and Michael DuCharme, both employees of Carlisle SynTec Systems, filed the lawsuit in June 2009 which contends the district’s use of a purchasing cooperative skirts state competitive bidding laws, resulting in higher costs for taxpayers.

While the district admits no wrongdoing, it has agreed to comply with state competitive bidding laws and cease the use of purchasing cooperatives, SynTec spokesman Brandon Peach said in a press release issued Monday.

“We’re glad the school district understands it can save taxpayer money by competitively bidding projects requiring roof work to ensure that the most qualified option is selected,” said DuCharme, director of product marketing for the company.

“Unfortunately, the well-intended cooperative purchasing method has resulted in inflated costs due to the inherent complexity of construction work,” DuCharme added.

Check Cumberlink and Tuesday's print edition of The Sentinel for more on this story.

Meet the Reporter

Joseph Cress
Sentinel Reporter
Twitter:
Facebook:
Google+:
Email:
jcress@cumberlink.com
Covers:
Education, Military 

Friends, we have a very long way to go, but if only a few more manufacturers take a stand as Carlisle-Syntec has,  the end of corruption, and taxpayer waste, is in sight.

THANK YOU CARLISLE for thinking outside a "Typical", passive, comfort zone, and WINNING.  We stand shoulder to shoulder with you, and celebrate your victory as our own.

I will encourage contractors to reward them with your P.O. book. 

THE "GOOD GUYS" WIN!

Dear friends, please reject negativity in all forms, and remember to always keep looking "UP".

Much Respect,

Robert R. "Ron" Solomon
Manager, Roof Consultant's Alliance
CCC1325620
RobertRSolomon@aol.com
Tampa, Florida - USA

Tuesday, July 17, 2012

Roofing Contractors/Consultants Accepting "Bribes"

Everything I say here is only for your consideration.  I write it, and you may evaluate the content as you see fit.  Fair?

I know the post title is rather provocative, but we'll break it down in smaller portions to understand the process.

First of all "Bribes" may be considered on any level.  From lunch at McDonald's to European Vacations, or African Safaris, and often this is the case.  I will offer the body of a recent post I made on Roof Consultant's Alliance:

Roofing Contractors accepting extravagant gifts from Material Manufacturers: A/K/A 'Indentured Servants".

Who is to blame for that? Manufacturer or Contractor?

Frankly, I think it is a practice that should be eliminated, much the same as handing out liquor at Christmas has. It's base, and ugly.

How many of you can be "Bought Off"? The fishing trips, the hunting trips, the golf trips, TV's, shotguns, etc. are not "Rewards", but bribes.

No one can tell me they don't expect you to pay for these things one way or another.

Trips to Europe, Alaska, Hawaii, etc. are not remotely uncommon, and we act like it's okay. Why isn't it Ron? After you've received their "Gift", they own you. That is until another manufacturer comes along and offers more free stuff.

I find it very unflattering, and a tool based upon greed alone. Yet, we see it like we "Won" something. No we didn't, we "Bought" something.

Here we are dealing with many billions of dollars in commerce, and sell ourselves to the highest bidder. I suggest you revisit your supplier, material manufacturer, and roofing contractor relationship.

Before we proceed, let me please state there are many fine, credible, and honest manufacturers, consultants and contractors.  This is not about them, but for the ones who are guilty of it as a "Lifestyle".

Consultants are being bought by manufacturers, and then they buy off the roofer. This is extraordinarily damaging to taxpayers who pay for the scam.

Nobody has to care about this, but once you lose your "Honor and Integrity", you might as well have a brand on your forehead.

This debauchery is insulting to all of us, and I'm sure the manufacturers will agree, once they think of their "Beggars". The "Beggars" are people who are always calling for a free lunch. They like to feel "Important", when in fact, they are nothing but "Pawns".

I'm sure many of you will try to justify it, just as I've tried to denounce it, but "Buying Business" always ends up on a dead end street.

Respect,

Robert R. "Ron" Solomon
Manager, Roof Consultant's Alliance
CCC1325620

Okay, you may think I'm being abstract for even questioning this long standing practice, but it has grown to epic proportion.  Why is it so bad now Ron?

Government Purchasing Agencies:

Help facilitate this behavior, and naturally, come the hogs to feed at the trough. 

Do they care about you?  Of course not.  Do they care about our educational facilities?  Of course not.  Do they have any self respect?  Of course not.

They understand one thing:  MONEY.

It's so bad that normally honest roofing contractors unwittingly allow themselves to be "Owned", and immediately lose all objectivity when providing the best products for the end user.

Far worse are the government agencies, and roof consultants, being bought off on a very regular basis.  Why should I care Ron?  You should care because these "Perks" cost money, and lots of it. 

They will try their best to eliminate any competition for taxpayer dollars (schools), so they can continue feeding the beast. It's thieves telling other thieves how to be thieves. 

The lure of money seems to strip many of their dignity, and I find that a crying shame. 

Whatever they do with a private owner is not my concern.  But when they bring it upon the taxpayers, I make it my business to bring a heightened awareness.

That "Heightened Awareness" portion means personal attention.

I catch a number of them, but I am only one person on a $0.00 budget.  I'm finding that I can overcome all thieves who steal from the government.  It's just a matter of how many hours a day I can devote to them.

My priority is streamlining the technique, and addressing them on a state or federal level.

The reason your taxpayer dollars are being stolen in huge chunks is because you remain silent, and they know you will remain silent. 

Apologies to all the honest people within the roofing discipline, as it's only the few (same ones every time) who bring shame.  Many times I've illustrated to you who they are, and who they are not.
 
Friends, I hope you and your families have been well since the last post.  Also hoping business is as you wish, and you are happy.

Please reject negativity in all forms, and always remember to keep looking "UP".

HELP EACH OTHER

Ron

RobertRSolomon@aol.com

Wednesday, June 27, 2012

"Respect to Roof Consultant's Institute BOD for Protecting Taxpayers"

Today, all TAXPAYERS, consultants, manufacturers, and contractors within the roofing discipline, may be proud.  RCI has taken a very definitive stance on "Government Purchasing", and "Purchasing Co-Op's", who do everything EXCEPT serve the taxpayer.

Before I go further, please let me list the complete position (with permission graciously provided by RCI):

 RCI, Inc.
1500 Sunday Drive, Suite 204
Raleigh, NC 27607-515
800-828-1902

 http://www.rci-online.org/


RCI Announces Position on Procurement
Raleigh, NC – RCI, Inc. President Arthur "Chip" Ward last week announced RCI's
position on public roofing project procurement.

RCI is dedicated to the attainment of quality roof systems that are within the customer's
budget, durable, code compliant, and environmentally friendly. Because the use of
group-purchasing agencies, "buy boards," and other similar purchasing models in any
type of building construction, remediation, or rehabilitation is not transparent, does not
provide a competitive bid situation, and may not ensure compliance with the minimum
requirements of the codes, RCI believes they should not be utilized. Independent
consulting and competitive bidding are much more likely to meet these objectives and
conserve the taxpayer/stakeholder assets.

The RCI Board of Directors has therefore adopted the following position on
procurement:
RCI, Inc. supports public policies, requirements, and administrative procedures in
public procurement processes that mandate the open selection of goods, services, and
construction contracts on the basis of qualifications and opposes such procurement on
the sole basis of fees, costs, and/or proprietary specifications. Competitive,
qualifications-based selection is essential to fostering fair and impartial purchasing that
serves public health and safety in the built environment. Preserving the health, safety
and welfare of the public is a moral, ethical, and legal requirement for a procurement
agency as well as the provider. RCI, Inc. maintains that the public is best served by a
procurement process which meets the unique and specific requirements inherent in each
individual project and contract.

It is the position of RCI, Inc. that all public work and taxpayer-funded projects should
clearly adhere to allapplicable procurement regulations, maintain the highest levels of
transparency and value, and comply with the following principles.

In addition to the owner, projects should involve three distinct entities: the design
professional, the manufacturer (or supplier), and the qualified contractor (contractor).

The design professional should be selected by the owner based on qualifications,
experience, and past performance. The design professional should prepare contract
documents to be in compliance with all applicable code requirements (including but not
limited to fire, wind, drainage, thermal resistance or performance, warranty, and
environmental requirements).
Contract documents should not be proprietary or exclusive to a manufacturer, a
supplier, or a qualified contractor. A product or system that may be able to be
produced, supplied, or installed by other competitors but is not, is considered a
proprietary product/system. Procurement regulations have specific procedures that
are required if proprietary materials or systems are to be considered.

Design professionals are discouraged from utilizing proprietary specifications. All
projects should utilize a minimum of three manufacturers or utilize materials commonly
available from three manufacturers. Systems should be selected to meet specific
performance criteria or standards.

1. The design professional must adhere to all state (provincial/territorial) licensing
requirements and carry the appropriate errors and omissions insurance.

2. The manufacturer and its suppliers should provide the materials and systems
adhering to the contract documents. A manufacturer should not act as the design
professional unless qualified to do so, and should state in writing and publicly its
financial interest in the specifications/requirements provided.

Contractual obligations or agreements should not exist between owners and
manufacturers. Proprietary and/or exclusionary specifications intended to limit
competition among manufacturers, suppliers, and/or qualified contractors are strongly
discouraged. Manufacturers are encouraged to provide data, information, or other
assistance to qualified contractors to determine the best use and application of their
materials and systems. Manufacturers should not control material specifications.

3. The contractor should be contracted directly by the owner. At no time should any
contractual or financial obligation or agreement exist between the design professional
and manufacturer, or the design professional and the qualified contractor, or the
manufacturer and the qualified contractor. At no time should the
manufacturer act as either the design professional or qualified contractor. At no time
should the design professional act as the manufacturer or contractor.

4. Design-build delivery methods are acceptable under the following conditions:
 * The principles noted above are met.

 *  Design-build delivery maintains a competitive bidding/tender environment among
all parties:
     designer, contractor, and manufacturer.

 *  A design-build contract is used to ensure that a clear line of responsibility for the
design and compliance with code is established.

RCI's Position Statement applies to all publicly bid work, including federal, state
(provincial/ territorial), municipal and local government projects or otherwise
taxpayer-funded projects in which RCI, Inc. members may participate. Projects not
under the procurement requirements of government agencies or that do not utilize
taxpayer funds should also employ similar fair and impartial procurement practices.

RCI is an international association of building envelope consultants whose members
specialize in design, investigation, repair, and management of roofing, exterior wall,
and waterproofing systems. RCI regularly hosts education programs designed to
demystify and explain the application of roofing, waterproofing, and exterior wall
technologies. For more information about RCI, visit:   call 800-828-1902.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Friends, this will hopefully "shut down" the wasteful spending, and eliminate
circumvention of procurement law.

This very direct, concise, and bold, position is essential knowledge the fiscal guardians
 we depend upon.  RCI "Stands Up" for it's members (and all taxpayers) trying to
make an honest living, while COMPETITIVELY BIDDING GOVERNMENT
PROJECT WORK.

RCI has set the "reference standard", and now it's up to the NRCA, ARMA, and
SPRI to follow suit in protecting us against such heinous taxpayer assault.

RCI, Inc.
1500 Sunday Drive, Suite 204
Raleigh, NC 27607-515
800-828-1902 | http://www.rci-online.org/



My dear friends, I've given everything I have for 9 years.  I knew the path would be strewn with obstacle, and the mission has been both physically, and emotionally, demanding.  But TODAY, we can rejoice by knowing RCI CARES!

The roofing discipline owes RCI for restoring honor, and integrity to our chosen trade, and for protecting the taxpayers, and ultimately saving hundreds of millions of dollars that would have otherwise have been wasted on absolutely NOTHING.

Thank you again to RCI's Board of Directors role of leadership for fighting what I consider the most fraudulent waste of taxpayer construction dollars going today.

I am humbled to be part of this movement, and bringing  it to your attention in the most specific way.

Today, I am happier than ever to say:  "Reject negativity in all forms, and always remember to keep looking "UP".

Respect,

Robert R. "Ron" Solomon
RobertRSolomon@aol.com
CCC1325620
Manager, "Roof Consultant's Alliance"